On 11/11/11 13:43, malina wrote:
> Would you mind therefore, to share your thoughts on *why* you are left
> with that impression that systemd is still not ready?
This had several reasons:
1. There were some very simple and obvious bugs, for example console not
working properly or some administrat
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I ran into a new problem today with the /run directory. As we create it
> right now, the permissions are 755. I was trying to run stunnel today
> and it wanted to write the stunnel.pid file after the program dropped
> root and was working as the stunnel user. It then fail
Hi Bruce,
On 11/12/2011 12:20 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I ran into a new problem today with the /run directory. As we create it
> right now, the permissions are 755. I was trying to run stunnel today
> and it wanted to write the stunnel.pid file after the program dropped
> root and was working as
(Sorry, been not-looking-at-this-stuff for a while...)
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I tried looking through current popt for a fix, but it's diverged
> quite a bit. Can you make this a real patch with description?
If you don't want to merge a newer upstream version (sounds like no?),
then sure, I can t
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> (Sorry, been not-looking-at-this-stuff for a while...)
>
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> I tried looking through current popt for a fix, but it's diverged
>> quite a bit. Can you make this a real patch with description?
>
> If you don't want to merge a newer upstream version (sou
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I ran into a new problem today with the /run directory. As we create it
>> right now, the permissions are 755. I was trying to run stunnel today
>> and it wanted to write the stunnel.pid file after the program dropped
>> root and was working as the
I must be doing something wrong, so please someone confirm or refute this:
coreutils-8.14 as per the 7.0 book installs
/usr/libexec/coreutils/libstdbuf.so. I had to pass --libexecdir=/usr/lib in
chaper 6 in order to fix the location as /usr/lib/coreutils/libstdbuf.so.
Anyone?
IvanK.
--
http:
Ivan Kabaivanov wrote:
> I must be doing something wrong, so please someone confirm or refute this:
>
> coreutils-8.14 as per the 7.0 book installs
> /usr/libexec/coreutils/libstdbuf.so. I had to pass --libexecdir=/usr/lib in
> chaper 6 in order to fix the location as /usr/lib/coreutils/libstdb
On Saturday 12 November 2011 15:28:35 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ivan Kabaivanov wrote:
> > I must be doing something wrong, so please someone confirm or refute
> > this:
> >
> > coreutils-8.14 as per the 7.0 book installs
> > /usr/libexec/coreutils/libstdbuf.so. I had to pass
> > --libexecdir=/usr/lib
Ivan Kabaivanov wrote:
> On Saturday 12 November 2011 15:28:35 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ivan Kabaivanov wrote:
>>> I must be doing something wrong, so please someone confirm or refute
>>> this:
>>>
>>> coreutils-8.14 as per the 7.0 book installs
>>> /usr/libexec/coreutils/libstdbuf.so. I had to pass
Hello,
Just a heads up, it seems that udev-175 installs udevd into
--libexecdir, ie /usr/lib/udev/udevd and not /sbin/udevd
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Hello,
> Just a heads up, it seems that udev-175 installs udevd into
> --libexecdir, ie /usr/lib/udev/udevd and not /sbin/udevd
Where did you find the udev-175 tarball?
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> (Sorry, been not-looking-at-this-stuff for a while...)
>>
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>> I tried looking through current popt for a fix, but it's diverged
>>> quite a bit. Can you make this a real patch with description?
>> If you don't want to merge a ne
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:05:37 -0600
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Just a heads up, it seems that udev-175 installs udevd into
> > --libexecdir, ie /usr/lib/udev/udevd and not /sbin/udevd
>
> Where did you find the udev-175 tarball?
>
I used git and checked out the tag
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:05:37 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Andrew Benton wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> Just a heads up, it seems that udev-175 installs udevd into
>>> --libexecdir, ie /usr/lib/udev/udevd and not /sbin/udevd
>> Where did you find the udev-175 tarball?
> I used gi
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:39:04 -0600
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ugh. Is there a mailing list for udev so I can ask about tarballs?
> Google doesn't seem to help.
>
I've made a tarball
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~andy/udev-175.tar.xz
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:39:04 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Ugh. Is there a mailing list for udev so I can ask about tarballs?
>> Google doesn't seem to help.
>>
>
> I've made a tarball
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~andy/udev-175.tar.xz
That's cool. We can alw
On 11/12/2011 04:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Installed library: libstdbuf.so
>> > Installed directory: /usr/lib/coreutils
> I made a change to that in the description in -dev. Thanks for pointing
> that out.
>
Unless I've misunderstood the above comment, you should set lib
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:39:04 -0600 Bruce Dubbs
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ugh. Is there a mailing list for udev so I can ask about
>>> tarballs? Google doesn't seem to help.
>>>
>> I've made a tarball
>>
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~andy/udev-175.tar.x
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Last time this came up on linux-hotplug, we got this:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/hotplug/msg05181.html
> "future versions will be posted once the kernel.org
> infrastructure is ready"
Well it's been down two and a half months. It's obviously not a
priority for t
DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 11/12/2011 04:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Installed library: libstdbuf.so
Installed directory: /usr/lib/coreutils
>> I made a change to that in the description in -dev. Thanks for pointing
>> that out.
> Unless I've misunderstood the above commen
21 matches
Mail list logo
