Hi all,
this some kind of Off-Topic since it has nothing to do with LFS at all. I
send this to this list because I know that there are quite a lot geeks and
experienced people out there who may have a hint for me.
Have you ever seen a machine which has too much RAM installed? We have a
brand new
tho...@equinox.homelinux.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this some kind of Off-Topic since it has nothing to do with LFS at all. I
> send this to this list because I know that there are quite a lot geeks and
> experienced people out there who may have a hint for me.
>
> Have you ever seen a machine whic
2009/11/30 :
> Hi all,
>
> this some kind of Off-Topic since it has nothing to do with LFS at all. I
> send this to this list because I know that there are quite a lot geeks and
> experienced people out there who may have a hint for me.
>
> Have you ever seen a machine which has too much RAM insta
Thomas wrote:
> Do you have an idea what the 32GB-limit could be? Or what could make the
> machine to behave the way it does?
>
> Our next step will be to test that all with the 64-bit stuff but it should
> work on 32bit too, isn't it?
>
> Any ideas?
It's possible that the file system you're using
Sorry, forget my last post. I misread the original and I didn't
notice that the file was created successfully when there was
less RAM present. In which case I have nothing further to add
beyond what Bruce has already suggested.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://w
32bit kernel, right?. Probably it's the kernel remaping mem. PAE is
quite slow. It's an old tale ;).
On 11/30/09, tho...@equinox.homelinux.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this some kind of Off-Topic since it has nothing to do with LFS at all. I
> send this to this list because I know that there are quit
30/11/09 18:40:13, :
Hi all,
this some kind of Off-Topic since it has nothing to do with LFS at all.
I
send this to this list because I know that there are quite a lot geeks
and
experienced people out there who may have a hint for me.
Have you ever seen a machine w
Hi all,
oh, many thanks for so much quick response and support!!
Yup, i forgot to mention that it is the 32bit-variant of the SLES10 with a
quite recent kernel (2.6.26 or so). The /proc/config.gz says that the
HIGHMEM64G option is set.
The filesystem is ext3 and the swap space is 16GByte on it
2009/11/30 Thomas Trepl :
>
> We will test it tomorrow with the 64bit SLES10. Will have to redo the whole
> installation but when it helps its ok.
>
You can't install just a 64-bit kernel and modules for testing ?
ĸen
--
After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!"
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/m