On Sunday 02 March 2008 02:02:23 David Jensen wrote:
> George Makrydakis wrote:
> > You know what? This can work on windows as well.
>
> LOL, and joe-sixpack visits LFS and clicks install ubuntu clone now!
What is the lol about?
Since when it was impossible to compile cross - platform compatible
Robert Daniels wrote:
> On Saturday 01 March 2008 08:59:13 taipan wrote:
>> Looks about right to my unskilled eye, but i'd say the 'linearity' of
>> modules 1 & 2 would be a bit trickier to implement than it initially
>> appears...
>>
>> If you were to take the 'diy-linux reference-build' as an exa
Hello,
I have digged up the archives of LeafOS lists and extracted RPM instructions and
spec files from them. Spec files up to and including Chapter 6 bash are attached
(slightly modified).
Dan: sorry for ignoring your superior work.
Differences from the book: the toolchain adjustment method
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
George Makrydakis wrote:
> On Sunday 02 March 2008 02:02:23 David Jensen wrote:
>> George Makrydakis wrote:
>>> You know what? This can work on windows as well.
>> LOL, and joe-sixpack visits LFS and clicks install ubuntu clone
>> now!
>
> What i
I'm sorry but I can't continue to take this mailing list. Despite
request by Gerard to STFU, the noise continues. I had hoped that ther
was some hope for a new project, one that I might enjoy being part of.
But there is ONE character who's ego is larger than I can take.
If he goes away, would so
On Sunday 02 March 2008 21:33:42 Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> I think it's a really bad idea for us to specifically try to teach
> anything to Joe Sixpack that's never even used Linux. Note I'm not
> saying that everyone who uses LFS had used Linux before they started --
> but those that didn't are mos
Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, at 06:40 Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>> Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 03/02/08 01:57 CST:
>>>
And just another thing and since we enable Imap, maybe the "--with-ssl"
option needs to be enabled by default.
>
TheOldFellow wrote:
> I'm sorry but I can't continue to take this mailing list. Despite
> request by Gerard to STFU, the noise continues. I had hoped that ther
> was some hope for a new project, one that I might enjoy being part of.
> But there is ONE character who's ego is larger than I can take
On Sunday 02 March 2008 02:26:07 taipan wrote:
>
> Yeah, you're right. In that sense, separate modules on bootstrapping
> & PM would be sequential as you initially proposed. However it still
> leaves the (optional) issue of scripting/automating the
> bootstrap-module unsolved. I'm afraid i have no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
George Makrydakis wrote:
> First of all, Joe Sixpack is David's term.
Yeah, I know that...
> Second, I did not use Windows before Linux :)
I'm not talking about you.
I'm talking about the people that you seem to want to use your program
- -- t
Robert Daniels wrote:
> I'm really not too sure what to do about the scripting myself. In some
> ways it makes sense to put it with package management, as they both
> relate to automation. As you note, it would also make sense before the
> bootstrap, to teach how to automate that module. A t
Never thought that the discussion about the future direction of LFS makes me
leaving. At the start time, I was somehow entusiastic and prepared me to
contribute time when there is something for me to do. That was just a week
ago. But than unfortunatly there did came up a guy which thinks he has
12 matches
Mail list logo
