etc/login.defs.linux seems to have been renamed to etc/login.defs,
therefore the build for Shadow-4.0.13 fails on the sed command that
generates /etc/login.defs in chapter 10.44. Shadow-4.0.13. This is a
change between 12 and 13
should be:
sed -e'[EMAIL PROTECTED]@MD5_CRYPT_ENAB yes@' \
-e
I know this is off topic, so don't shout at me...
I was trying to build strace-4.5.12 under x86_64 but it has compilation
problems. Attached is a patch, taken from gentoo that fixes there.
Regards,
Duncan
strace-4.5.12-gentoo.patch.bz2
Description: Binary data
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Duncan Webb wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Duncan Webb wrote:
9.4. Expect-5.43.0
I think the configure line should be:
CC="gcc ${BUILD64}" ./configure --prefix=/tools --with-tcl=/tools/lib \
--with-tclinclude=$TCLPATH --with-x=no
because the tools have no
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Duncan Webb wrote:
I know this is off topic, so don't shout at me...
I was trying to build strace-4.5.12 under x86_64 but it has compilation
problems. Attached is a patch, taken from gentoo that fixes there.
Regards,
Duncan
Blimey, it's a bit big, isn't it ;) I've g
M.Canales.es wrote:
The method implemented few minutes ago is based on that, but instead to change
all "if" to "case" a function based in "case" string text has been added and
that function is used inside the "if".
#---#
_IS_() # Function to test bu
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Duncan Webb wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Duncan Webb wrote:
9.4. Expect-5.43.0
I think the configure line should be:
CC="gcc ${BUILD64}" ./configure --prefix=/tools
--with-tcl=/tools/lib \
--with-tclinclude=$TCLPATH --with-x=no
bec
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Duncan Webb wrote:
I know this is off topic, so don't shout at me...
I was trying to build strace-4.5.12 under x86_64 but it has
compilation problems. Attached is a patch, taken from gentoo that
fixes there.
Regards,
Duncan
Blimey, it's a bit big
Duncan Webb wrote:
etc/login.defs.linux seems to have been renamed to etc/login.defs,
therefore the build for Shadow-4.0.13 fails on the sed command that
generates /etc/login.defs in chapter 10.44. Shadow-4.0.13. This is a
change between 12 and 13
should be:
sed -e'[EMAIL PROTECTED]@MD5_CRYP
I have repaired a problem with the blfs-bugs database. Bugzilla should
be working properly now. Please let me know if there are any problems.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above informa
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> The method documented in the svn book doesn't work for me. The script
>> that the 15-alsa.rules file associates with udev's discovery of a
>> control interface is never apparently called (Udev-063).
>
>
> could you please
Hey Guys,
Throwing this out there in case anyone has any ideas. I'm following the
current Cross LFS instructions (generally) to attempt to build multilib
on a PowerPC G5 running Mac OS X. (I added a patch for ppc multilib just
now to the patches repo for that.) I can get up to the glibc-header
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Configure runs successfully, but then during make I get the following:
Sorry, it looks like some of the output was cut off, here's the full error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-20050926'
{ echo '#include "posix/bits/posix1_lim.h"';\
ec
Duncan Webb wrote:
Small patch to write a message when shadow fails because login.defs is
missing, it still writes the syslog message. But the user gets some
feedback why it failed.
Thanks Duncan. As shadow is actively maintained, would you mind
submitting this upstream please? We can then
Richard A Downing wrote these words on 10/25/05 12:16 CST:
> Should we ask the LFS guys to take that out of their rules, so that we
> can deal with it in BLFS?
I am against that idea because the device nodes are going to be
created regardless if there is a rule or not. Only thing is if
LFS doesn
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Configure runs successfully, but then during make I get the following:
Sorry, it looks like some of the output was cut off, here's the full
error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-20050926'
{ echo '#include "posix/bits/posi
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hey Guys,
Throwing this out there in case anyone has any ideas. I'm following the
current Cross LFS instructions (generally) to attempt to build multilib on a
PowerPC G5 running Mac OS X. (I added a patch for ppc multilib just now to
the patches re
Jim Gifford wrote:
Jeremy, trying doing a glibc-headers build first, this should install
any missing headers. Follow the one on the x86_64 page. Also don't
forget to create the stub files for linux-libc-headers.
Sorry, I should have been more clear. This *is* the glibc-headers build.
This
Ken Moffat wrote:
If you are doing something unusual, it doesn't always do to trust the
error messages. Mostly, they are apt, but sometimes the cause of the
error is not what the person who wrote the message expected. I think
OSX used to give difficulties because it was, or is, case insensi
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Perhaps, try symlinking /tools/include/stddef.h to
/tools/include/linux/stddef.h (based on
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2005-09/msg00092.html ) ?
If that helps, the end of the thread hinted that other headers might
perhaps need the same treatment.
I'll give
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
>> If anything is
>> written, I'd be glad to peruse it and give an opinion as someone who
>> still has only the loosest grasp of how the hardware is set up.
>
>
> Well, I've written some notes up on this, though they're not entirely
> accurate.
> h
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:03:54AM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> I'm of the opinion that leaving it at a simple case switch would have
> been the best. Does anyone else have an opinion? Does it really matter?
As for mattering, it happens what? 77? times give or take? Once before
each compil
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
That seems to have done it :) I didn't feel brave enough to start
messing with symlinks in my include dir. Thanks.
I'll continue from here and let you know of my progress.
Btw, Jim, if you want to set up in the book for a multilib powerpc
section, I can start adding
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
That seems to have done it :) I didn't feel brave enough to start
messing with symlinks in my include dir. Thanks.
I'll continue from here and let you know of my progress.
Btw, Jim, if you want to set up in the book for a multilib powerpc
s
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Duncan Webb wrote:
Small patch to write a message when shadow fails because login.defs
is missing, it still writes the syslog message. But the user gets
some feedback why it failed.
Thanks Duncan. As shadow is actively maintained, would you mind
submitting this ups
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Duncan Webb wrote:
I know this is off topic, so don't shout at me...
I was trying to build strace-4.5.12 under x86_64 but it has
compilation problems. Attached is a patch, taken from gentoo that
fixes there.
Regards,
Duncan
Blimey, it's a bit big
25 matches
Mail list logo
