Archaic wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:35:52PM -0400, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
### RATIONALE FOR REMOVAL ### ptmx - isn't directly accessed by a
user. /etc/fstab dictates pty perms
That's incorrect; this change would break PTYs completely.
And apparently your statem
On 9/14/05, Richard A Downing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to go against everything my BLFS editorial colleagues have said,
> but I rather like this proposal.
>
> I think it adds to the educational nature of both books.
>
> If a device exists and has no rule in the lfs set, then a node is
>
Archaic wrote:
> And apparently your statement is also incorrect because ssh can
> properly create ptys all day long with the proper permissions. So
> apparently a closer look into both scenarios is warranted.
I didn't try ssh. But I did try xterm and expect (both of which use
PTYs), and both fai
Dom wrote:
> So I know I'm not making it easy for myself here, but does anyone have any
> suggestion on making, not necessarily a tiny distro, but making it using
> minimal resources and being as small as possible. I've read the tips and
> stuff, and I'll do them next time, but I would like more he
As I was looking around in
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/alfs/downloads/profiles/lfs/svn/ for a
nice profile, after jhalfs failed to do its work (complex nested bash
scripts always seem to fail for one reason or another), I happily
stumbled upon profile-LFS-GCC4.tar.bz2 To my surprise, I found o
-snip lengthly messages-
Hi all,
I have been following this thread and I have a suggestion that I believe
to be a good compromise.
When installing the Udev package in LFS, add a file called 99default to
the /etc/udev/rules.d directory which basically just puts all the
devices in their defaul
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> On 9/14/05, Richard A Downing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Sorry to go against everything my BLFS editorial colleagues have said,
>>but I rather like this proposal.
>>
>>I think it adds to the educational nature of both books.
>>
>>If a device exists and has no rule in
Matt, one thing I think everyone here has forgot, what about cross-lfs.
How will the change affect us.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
