Dan,
We just need someone to lay down the law between the projects. I
think your perfect for the job.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 5/23/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
> To just make sure we all have a clear understanding.
>
> 1 - Repo will be created for Bootscripts and Udev rules
> 2 - Repo to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan ( my choices). With the
> Dev Teams from BLFS, CLFS,
Jim Gifford wrote:
To just make sure we all have a clear understanding.
1 - Repo will be created for Bootscripts and Udev rules
2 - Repo to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan ( my choices). With the
Dev Teams from BLFS, CLFS, and LFS.
3 - Trunk to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan.
CLFS
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Everyone? IIRC Jeremy made the suggestion, Dan agreed, now *everyone*
wants to move from a process that is well understood and appears to
work without problems to some new procedure whose benefits haven't
even been outlined?
The current process doesn't take in account
Justin R. Knierim wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
we still need to hear Alexander's comments on it, so let's give him
the time he needs. (I think he's sleeping, atm.)
He is gone for another week at least, an exam and other things until
20060602:
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archi
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
we still need to hear Alexander's comments on it, so let's give him the
time he needs. (I think he's sleeping, atm.)
He is gone for another week at least, an exam and other things until
20060602:
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/livecd/2006-May/003576
Jim Gifford wrote:
Is this acceptable to all.
The bootscripts package and udev rules seem to me to be two separate
issues here, and at least until there's shown to be some benefit of
merging those two together, I'd prefer to keep them separate. So far,
most seem agreeable to making the udev
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 05/23/06 16:07 CST:
What everyone wants is a unified package, where all the scripts for
BLFS, CLFS, and LFS are in one package. We will need to become dependent
on the this team that will be handling this package. We can have them
release a nightly tarball i
Jim Gifford wrote:
Randy,
What everyone wants is a unified package, where all the scripts for
BLFS, CLFS, and LFS are in one package.
Everyone? IIRC Jeremy made the suggestion, Dan agreed, now *everyone*
wants to move from a process that is well understood and appears to work
without pro
Randy,
What everyone wants is a unified package, where all the scripts for
BLFS, CLFS, and LFS are in one package. We will need to become dependent
on the this team that will be handling this package. We can have them
release a nightly tarball if we need to, but these are the details that
a
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 05/23/06 15:51 CST:
> Randy,
> We would have our own branches, and DJ, Alex, and Dan would control
> the releases and what is in trunk. If a release is needed, the dev teams
> would contact them with the reason for the release and they would take
> care of it
Randy,
We would have our own branches, and DJ, Alex, and Dan would control
the releases and what is in trunk. If a release is needed, the dev teams
would contact them with the reason for the release and they would take
care of it.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FA
El Martes, 23 de Mayo de 2006 22:41, Jim Gifford escribió:
> Is this acceptable to all.
Seem fine to me.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES:
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 05/23/06 15:41 CST:
> Is this acceptable to all.
No. One person should not have final say on anything except an overall
project leader. For example, the entire BLFS Editing staff should have
write privileges to whatever repo will be used to create the
'production'
To just make sure we all have a clear understanding.
1 - Repo will be created for Bootscripts and Udev rules
2 - Repo to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan ( my choices). With the
Dev Teams from BLFS, CLFS, and LFS.
3 - Trunk to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan.
CLFS Branch to be maintai
15 matches
Mail list logo