Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Jim Gifford
Dan, We just need someone to lay down the law between the projects. I think your perfect for the job. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 5/23/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jim Gifford wrote: > To just make sure we all have a clear understanding. > > 1 - Repo will be created for Bootscripts and Udev rules > 2 - Repo to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan ( my choices). With the > Dev Teams from BLFS, CLFS,

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Jim Gifford wrote: To just make sure we all have a clear understanding. 1 - Repo will be created for Bootscripts and Udev rules 2 - Repo to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan ( my choices). With the Dev Teams from BLFS, CLFS, and LFS. 3 - Trunk to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan. CLFS

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Jim Gifford
Matthew Burgess wrote: Everyone? IIRC Jeremy made the suggestion, Dan agreed, now *everyone* wants to move from a process that is well understood and appears to work without problems to some new procedure whose benefits haven't even been outlined? The current process doesn't take in account

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Justin R. Knierim wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote: we still need to hear Alexander's comments on it, so let's give him the time he needs. (I think he's sleeping, atm.) He is gone for another week at least, an exam and other things until 20060602: http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archi

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Justin R. Knierim
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: we still need to hear Alexander's comments on it, so let's give him the time he needs. (I think he's sleeping, atm.) He is gone for another week at least, an exam and other things until 20060602: http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/livecd/2006-May/003576

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Jim Gifford wrote: Is this acceptable to all. The bootscripts package and udev rules seem to me to be two separate issues here, and at least until there's shown to be some benefit of merging those two together, I'd prefer to keep them separate. So far, most seem agreeable to making the udev

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 05/23/06 16:07 CST: What everyone wants is a unified package, where all the scripts for BLFS, CLFS, and LFS are in one package. We will need to become dependent on the this team that will be handling this package. We can have them release a nightly tarball i

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Matthew Burgess
Jim Gifford wrote: Randy, What everyone wants is a unified package, where all the scripts for BLFS, CLFS, and LFS are in one package. Everyone? IIRC Jeremy made the suggestion, Dan agreed, now *everyone* wants to move from a process that is well understood and appears to work without pro

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Jim Gifford
Randy, What everyone wants is a unified package, where all the scripts for BLFS, CLFS, and LFS are in one package. We will need to become dependent on the this team that will be handling this package. We can have them release a nightly tarball if we need to, but these are the details that a

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 05/23/06 15:51 CST: > Randy, > We would have our own branches, and DJ, Alex, and Dan would control > the releases and what is in trunk. If a release is needed, the dev teams > would contact them with the reason for the release and they would take > care of it

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Jim Gifford
Randy, We would have our own branches, and DJ, Alex, and Dan would control the releases and what is in trunk. If a release is needed, the dev teams would contact them with the reason for the release and they would take care of it. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FA

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread M.Canales.es
El Martes, 23 de Mayo de 2006 22:41, Jim Gifford escribió: > Is this acceptable to all. Seem fine to me. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES:

Re: Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 05/23/06 15:41 CST: > Is this acceptable to all. No. One person should not have final say on anything except an overall project leader. For example, the entire BLFS Editing staff should have write privileges to whatever repo will be used to create the 'production'

Summarize of Plan and changes - was Re: Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

2006-05-23 Thread Jim Gifford
To just make sure we all have a clear understanding. 1 - Repo will be created for Bootscripts and Udev rules 2 - Repo to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan ( my choices). With the Dev Teams from BLFS, CLFS, and LFS. 3 - Trunk to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan. CLFS Branch to be maintai