Jim Gifford wrote:
To just make sure we all have a clear understanding.
1 - Repo will be created for Bootscripts and Udev rules
2 - Repo to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan ( my choices). With the
Dev Teams from BLFS, CLFS, and LFS.
3 - Trunk to be maintained by DJ, Alex, and Dan.
CLFS Branch to be maintained by CLFS Dev Team
LFS Branch to be maintained by LFS Dev Team
BLFS Branch to be maintained by BLFS Dev TEAM
4 - DJ, Alex, and Dan get final-say of what gets released and what gets
pulled from the BLFS, CLFS, and LFS branches
5 - Bootscripts and Udev Rules will need their own Trac to log bugs to
The only outstanding issue is the UID's/GID's, which we are the process
of making a change in CLFS to maintain the same list as LFS, but with
notes about the additional users.
Please don't omit BLFS from the equation.
Is this acceptable to all.
+1, assuming the following:
1) At least one of DJ and Dan agrees.
2) This proposal gets implemented shortly after 2006-06-02.
3) The "contrib" directory for unofficial stuff (like the persistent CD symlinks
from Debian) is allowed.
4) Some form of documentation notes for BLFS is agreed upon (e.g., how to keep
proposed rules for group membership that are not part of base LFS installation,
e.g., "audio").
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
