Bernard Leak wrote:
The word is "programme". Yes, it really is, unless you
are writing American. It is a curiosity of the LFS book
that it's not instantly obvious whether it's written in
American English or not. The use of "alternative"
suggests that it isn't mid-American,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 06:21:47PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> I know it is (despite English teachers in England having taught me
> otherwise), you know it is, but unlike you, I prefer to avoid such
> antagonistic comments :)
But where would be the humor in that? :)
--
Archaic
Want con
Archaic wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:45:39PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
This was actually fixed yesterday. Today's render should correct it.
If he is reading the pre1, then no it shouldn't. The pre-1 isn't being
edited. Changes are going to branch and branch is still using "testing".
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:45:39PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> >Preface.7 refers to
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/errata-6.1-pre1/
> > which seems not to exist (!)
>
> This was actually fixed yesterday. Today's render should correct it.
If he is reading the pre1
Bernard Leak wrote:
Dear List,
I present a few nits I have picked out of the
hair of blfs-6.1-pre1 (the book):
I've decided to send this collection as it is rather than wait for
"completion". I dare say I will find others later.
I hope not...we've just been through a pretty thorough re
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > And if push comes to shove, I assume Canadian usage will be the
> > preferred model ;)
>
> Eh! :)
>
Well, it's Gerard's project.
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/li
> And if push comes to shove, I assume Canadian usage will be the
> preferred model ;)
Yay! :) BTW, Happy Canada Day to those Canadians on here. ;) (Sure I'm
about 5 days late saying it on here, but I had a HECK of a good time on the
first!)
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mail
Ken Moffat wrote:
And if push comes to shove, I assume Canadian usage will be the
preferred model ;)
Eh! :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bernard Leak wrote:
For the rest of us:
"Program" is merely an American (mis-)spelling,
adopted by people who failed to know better.
Careful. Your words here could very easily be taken as offensive.
And for what its worth, the *entire* English language is full of holes
and ignoran
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Bernard Leak wrote:
> Dear List,
> I present a few nits I have picked out of the
> hair of blfs-6.1-pre1 (the book):
LFS, not blfs.
> The word is "programme". Yes, it really is, unless you
> are writing American. It is a curiosity of the LFS book
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
