Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-05-13 Thread Olaf
On 2012-04-29 07:09, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 00:39 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> I'm assuming this is from gnulib-tests/test-getlogin.c. Not seen >> this failure in my builds earlier this week, perhaps it's a one-off >> or perhaps something in the 3.3.4 headers has changed. >

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-05-01 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:07:30PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:12:10AM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 04:59 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > As I said originally, this was a new failure for me. And also, the > > > sed doesn't seem to fix it. > >

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-30 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:12:10AM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 04:59 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > As I said originally, this was a new failure for me. And also, the > > sed doesn't seem to fix it. > > That's interesting. Would you be able to put some debugging output i

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-30 Thread Matt Burgess
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 04:59 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > As I said originally, this was a new failure for me. And also, the > sed doesn't seem to fix it. That's interesting. Would you be able to put some debugging output into the test-getlogin.c file to see where abouts it is failing, and why?

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-29 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 06:01:08PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > There's a sed in the book to avoid the test failure. The sed is not the > > right fix, but I'm working on-and-off with upstream to try and get to > > the bottom of the issue. > > > > Regards, > > > > Matt. > > > Thanks - I th

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-29 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 06:09:58AM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 00:39 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > I'm assuming this is from gnulib-tests/test-getlogin.c. Not seen > > this failure in my builds earlier this week, perhaps it's a one-off > > or perhaps something in the 3.3.

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-28 Thread Matt Burgess
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 00:39 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > I'm assuming this is from gnulib-tests/test-getlogin.c. Not seen > this failure in my builds earlier this week, perhaps it's a one-off > or perhaps something in the 3.3.4 headers has changed. There's a sed in the book to avoid the test fail

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > Thanks. It wasn't known to me and it didn't fail from the same > script, invoked in the same way, using the 20120419 or 20120425 > books, or indeed 7.1. Coreutils was one of those packages where > it was hard to miss failures in the testsuite. test-getlogin was not in coreu

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-28 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 06:54:58PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > I'm assuming this is from gnulib-tests/test-getlogin.c. Not seen > > this failure in my builds earlier this week, perhaps it's a one-off > > or perhaps something in the 3.3.4 headers has changed. > > > > O

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > (resending, hopefully I've got the right list this time) > > I'm building the current book with the newer grep, man-pages, > kernel-headers, and autofoo that Matt is working on. This is as a > test of my hardware (looking good at the moment, but a few BLFS > packages have ca