BTW, my initramfs implementation SUCKS, but is complete, works for just
about everything, and can easily be reversed engineered as a learning
exercise.
I know how to do it better now, but it is good enough as it is and serves my
immediate purposes.
Maybe someday I'll clean it out and make it sma
I believe I have a fairly "neutral" Package Management implementation.
I hope somebody swings by
http://kitepilot.com/LFS/
and gives me an opinion...
Thanks.
Enrique
DJ Lucas writes:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>> Gordon Schumacher wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed, I'm not even attempting to address that yet
DJ Lucas wrote:
> Gordon Schumacher wrote:
>
>> Indeed, I'm not even attempting to address that yet - for the
>> immediate moment, just getting each package's files isolated into its
>> own tarball is such a big first step that I'm willing to deal with any
>> changes that need to be made to i
DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> For example, here is my chapter 6 glibc and chapter 6
> binutils build scripts:
>
From 6.4, not SVN. I didn't yet want to mess with the changes in the
toolchain.
-- DJ Lucas
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be cle
Gordon Schumacher wrote:
> Indeed, I'm not even attempting to address that yet - for the
> immediate moment, just getting each package's files isolated into its
> own tarball is such a big first step that I'm willing to deal with any
> changes that need to be made to install those packages.
Yea
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:11:09 -0600, DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> > It's not enough just to tar up the DESTDIR. You need to
>> > consider installing the package (which IMO should be done by a script
>> > created in the DESTDIR after removing any updated/dynamic
DJ Lucas wrote:
Sorry about the subject.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
