I believe I have a fairly "neutral" Package Management implementation. I hope somebody swings by http://kitepilot.com/LFS/ and gives me an opinion... Thanks. Enrique
DJ Lucas writes: > DJ Lucas wrote: >> Gordon Schumacher wrote: >> >>> Indeed, I'm not even attempting to address that yet - for the >>> immediate moment, just getting each package's files isolated into its >>> own tarball is such a big first step that I'm willing to deal with any >>> changes that need to be made to install those packages. >>> >> >> Yeah, it's a little bit of work, but not all that bad. In my 'vision' >> of the perfect balance between packaging and being PM neutral, I've >> chosen to create a /packages directory and use it as the working >> directory for packaging and installation. I've divided each package >> into 3 parts: build, install, post-install, and used scripts for each. >> It's a first attempt so be nice! It *can* be streamlined... >> > ...like test suites run after install. Still some cruft in there from > that in the cleanup section of build.sh for each package. > > Anyway, group of scripts is put up at > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/DESTDIR-LFS-6.4/ > and a tarball (if you really want it) at > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/packages-6.4.tar.bz2 > > I must say that new system is a lot faster than my normal build PC. I > think I'll try to make it catch up to my dev system...give me another > box ready for alternate directories anyway. OK, back to Gnome for me. > > -- DJ Lucas > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
