Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Until they finally kick me off their server, I've got a little repo of
> stuff trying to track my work on this:
>
> http://students.washington.edu/dbnichol/lfs/
Thanks again, Dan. I've merged all recent changes from trunk into the
alphabetical branch, and I took some small
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Dan, Chris:
I see you guys have done a lot of work over the past week. Thank you
very much for that. I'm having a little trouble sorting through the
hundreds of emails in my Inbox today and pinpointing exactly what
changes are ready to go into the alpha branch.
Would
On 1/4/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you guys mind giving me a little summary of the progress of the
> last week? Also, Chris, I believe you have a patch for the book, right?
> Which is the current one?
Until they finally kick me off their server, I've got a little repo of
Dan Nicholson wrote:
OK, but in this case it was useful. Putting bison in Ch.5, and moving
flex before bison in Ch. 6 has cleared up the ICA differences. Later
I'll actually look at the bison source a bit to confirm this, but I'm
pretty sure there's a circular dependency here. flex uses bison,
On 1/4/06, Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/3/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For evidence, here's a diff of the build logs between iter1 and iter2 for
> > bison:
> >
> > --- iter1/bison-2.1.log 2005-12-29 11:50:40.0 -0800
> > +++ iter2/bison-2.1.log 2005
On 1/3/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For evidence, here's a diff of the build logs between iter1 and iter2 for
> bison:
>
> --- iter1/bison-2.1.log 2005-12-29 11:50:40.0 -0800
> +++ iter2/bison-2.1.log 2005-12-29 13:28:54.0 -0800
> @@ -79,8 +79,7 @@
> checking for
On 1/2/06, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks pretty good. I'm pretty sure you'll find perl, vim and nscd are
> different due to timestamps embedded into the binaries. You can easily
> confirm this by using `strings' and `diff' eg:
>
> strings cmp/iter1/*/nscd > 1
> strings cmp/iter2/*
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> OK, round 2 here. I made a couple changes, some of which were just
> guesses and haven't affected anything. bison, perl, vim, nscd are
> still causing problems.
Looks pretty good. I'm pretty sure you'll find perl, vim and nscd are
different due to timestamps embedded into
On 12/23/05, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've done an ICA/Farce report on the LFS Alphabetical branch.
OK, round 2 here. I made a couple changes, some of which were just
guesses and haven't affected anything. bison, perl, vim, nscd are
still causing problems. A minimal changelog
On 12/27/05, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> > I think you may be right about not
> > installing the locales for the purposes of ICA. I'm gonna change the
> > locale installation to check for RUN_ICA in my scripts.
>
> Don't be too concerned with the locale-archi
On 12/27/05, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My memory is getting hazy (been a long day), but I have a suspicion
> that bison might also be affected by the missing gettext.
I'm moving flex and gettext up in the build. We'll see what happens.
> The big hassle is trying to make sense o
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I think you may be right about not
> installing the locales for the purposes of ICA. I'm gonna change the
> locale installation to check for RUN_ICA in my scripts.
Don't be too concerned with the locale-archive. It's just data and not
program code. I once spent some time l
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
bison, perl, vim - for me, these differ between my second and third
builds, but not for my third and fourth, nor for the first and second -
I guess this is the whole point of ICA and the build will be assumed
guilty unless an explanation can be produced.
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Did LFS use to build bison and flex in /tools?
When we used HJL binutils (before FSF binutils supported TLS/NPTL), yes.
HJL binutils require bison and flex (or at least, they used to).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/ma
On 12/26/05, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been attempting to run an ICA on my CLFS ppc builds (CLFS from
> 20051214, but modified to also build a minimal 64-bit toolchain in
> /opt/kgcc because the cpu is a G5). So, my observations have very
> little to do with the alphabetical b
On 12/23/05, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't done any research yet, but I'm attaching the ICA report for
> 1v2. With the exception of farce-extras (too big to move around), you
> can see the results in http://students.washington.edu/dbnichol/lfs/ .
One thing that looks strang
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I haven't done any research yet, but I'm attaching the ICA report for
1v2. With the exception of farce-extras (too big to move around), you
can see the results in http://students.washington.edu/dbnichol/lfs/ .
I'm going out of town in the morning, so
Hi everyone,
I've done an ICA/Farce report on the LFS Alphabetical branch. The
build was done on anduin despite what seem to be some hardware issues.
Hopefully that hasn't affected the binaries. I don't have time to do
much with the results right now, but I thought I'd put them up for
public co
18 matches
Mail list logo
