On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 08:29:51AM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 08:15 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:09:50 -0400, Baho Utot
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The file system is ext3 the same as on each box. Rsync is not an option
> >> as only the desktop machine has it at t
On 10/04/2012 08:15 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:09:50 -0400, Baho Utot
> wrote:
>
>> The file system is ext3 the same as on each box. Rsync is not an option
>> as only the desktop machine has it at this time.
>> cp -av doesn't work either, the copy never happens but the
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:09:50 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> The file system is ext3 the same as on each box. Rsync is not an option
> as only the desktop machine has it at this time.
> cp -av doesn't work either, the copy never happens but the result in the
> term shows every thing copied and worke
On 10/03/2012 09:23 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:52:14PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>> Actually it goes much farther for me. It isn't just this package or
>> that package but a general direction of linux seems to going down hill (
>> in my opinion) faster that a snowball headed
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:52:14PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>
> Actually it goes much farther for me. It isn't just this package or
> that package but a general direction of linux seems to going down hill (
> in my opinion) faster that a snowball headed for hell. Everyone seems to
> want someth
On 10/03/2012 12:18 PM, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
[putolin]
> I am sorry to see this discussion turning into - If AAA succeed in
> moving linux to BBB I am moving to *BSD - XXX is a solution trying
> desperately to find a problem - The whole thing reminds me of a
> patient with cancer - In my
On 10/02/12 18:39, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>
>> If Lennart and redhat succeed in moving linux to systemd I am moving to
>> *BSD. I have talked to many BSD developers ( there was a linux fest on
>> saturday here) and they plan on sticking to a "scripts" base init
>> system. I am curr
> Baho Utot wrote:
> It goes beyond kernel modules, systemd will respawn daemons that have
> stopped/failed. Opps slap me silly they are not daemons they are
> services now.
What's wrong with that? It reminds me of Dan Bernstein's daemontools
where daemons are supervised and restarted when the
On Oct 2, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
Lucky you. Until I get a LFS/BLFS desktop running I am stuck with
cgroups
Actually, the direction isn't with linux, it's with something other
than linux.
You can run the linux kernel with cgroups, you can run it without
anything.
Do not gro
On 10/02/2012 06:35 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>
>> I am just getting aggravated with the direction of linux with the
>> cgroups etc.
> # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
Lucky you. Until I get a LFS/BLFS desktop running I am stuck with cgroups
>
>> I'll be glad when I get LFS/BLFS built
Baho Utot wrote:
> I am just getting aggravated with the direction of linux with the
> cgroups etc.
# CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
> I'll be glad when I get LFS/BLFS built to KDE so I can ditch distros.
Try xfce. The build is faster and it seems to run cleanly without a lot
of unwanted bells and
On 10/02/2012 12:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>
>> If Lennart and redhat succeed in moving linux to systemd I am moving to
>> *BSD. I have talked to many BSD developers ( there was a linux fest on
>> saturday here) and they plan on sticking to a "scripts" base init
>> system. I am
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 11:23:12AM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>
> Ugh,
>
> If Lennart and redhat succeed in moving linux to systemd I am moving to
> *BSD. I have talked to many BSD developers ( there was a linux fest on
> saturday here) and they plan on sticking to a "scripts" base init
> system
Baho Utot wrote:
> If Lennart and redhat succeed in moving linux to systemd I am moving to
> *BSD. I have talked to many BSD developers ( there was a linux fest on
> saturday here) and they plan on sticking to a "scripts" base init
> system. I am currently looking at their udev "replacement/work
On 10/02/2012 10:14 AM, Chris W. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to better understand the inner workings of systemd. Just having
> finished a LFS install on a test server, I thought LFS 7.2 might be a
> good basis for this. My goal was to eventually replace SysVinit
> completely with systemd. I fully
15 matches
Mail list logo
