Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread John Kelly
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:50:52 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I had fully intended to leave LFS ... I wasn't able to keep myself away. Sounds like an addiction. >Manuel roused my attention with jhalfs Since we talked last, I improved my diy-linux scripts to do what I mentione

Re: How to use the pkgsrc of NetBSD with LFS?

2005-09-18 Thread John Kelly
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:25:34 +1000 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The part that of course can be automated however, is the building of the >individual pieces themselves. One thing I haven't seen in any system >completely yet I don't think though (or certainly no system on Linux anywayz) >is a s

Re: How to use the pkgsrc of NetBSD with LFS?

2005-09-18 Thread John Kelly
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:21:15 -0500, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>I find it very useful to know how every file on the system was installed, >>>and which package installed it. >> >> Why? >3) It helps me to keep the BLFS book accurate, as BLFS (the same as > LFS) annotates install

Re: How to use the pkgsrc of NetBSD with LFS?

2005-09-18 Thread John Kelly
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:03:12 -0500, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I find it very useful to know how every file on the system was installed, >and which package installed it. Why? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubs

Re: How to use the pkgsrc of NetBSD with LFS?

2005-09-18 Thread John Kelly
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:54:17 +1000 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've never seen a single package management solution yet that I've > been entirely happy with. People struggle with package management because "packages" are what distribution vendors provide. But who needs packages? Building

Re: some minor bootscript things

2005-09-15 Thread John Kelly
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:08:50 -0400, Joshua Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> tell me which changes (if any) would be needed for that shell? > >honestly, far too many ... tcsh is a csh derivative, the syntax and >such is far removed form the bourne shells ... it would require a near >full re-wri

Re: Discrepancy in Structure, Grammar Suggestion in 1.1

2005-09-11 Thread John Kelly
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:29:38 -0600, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In section 1.1, How to Build an LFS System, the following sounds (at >> least to my ears) grammatically odd: "While this may initially seem like >> a lot of work to isolate the new system from the host distribution, a >>

Re: PC Magazine article

2005-09-04 Thread John Kelly
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 19:49:12 +0100, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Randy McMurchy wrote: >> http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1854005,00.asp >"A good resource for beginners is www.linuxfromscratch.org". They say there's no such thing as bad publicity ... but in this case, maybe

Re: [RFC] ALFS implementations

2005-08-09 Thread John Kelly
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:38:02 -0400 (EDT), Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >extracting the commands from the book's XML source ... Manuel has created >a XSL stylesheet that can extract all the commands and dump them into text >files. diy-linux seems to be doing this too. >This could b