On Jun 19, 2012 2:52 PM, "Ken Moffat" wrote:
>
> As usual, I have a talent for sometimes expressing myself *too*
> directly - that wasn't intended to be offensive or insulting, but
> could easily be taken that way. If anyone did read it like that, I
> apologise to Matt : feel free to call me a [
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:34:23PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:46:51AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:40:39 -0500, Bruce Dubbs
> > wrote:
> > > Armin K. wrote:
> > >> For those of you not following systemd-devel mailing list, here are some
> > >
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:46:51AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:40:39 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Armin K. wrote:
> >> For those of you not following systemd-devel mailing list, here are some
> >> responses from Lennart regarding systemd and udev split.
> >
> > I figur
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:40:39 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>> For those of you not following systemd-devel mailing list, here are some
>> responses from Lennart regarding systemd and udev split.
>
> I figured we'd get that type of response, if any at all.
Given the noises upstream
Armin K. wrote:
> For those of you not following systemd-devel mailing list, here are some
> responses from Lennart regarding systemd and udev split.
I figured we'd get that type of response, if any at all.
We need to add things to udev anyway, like the persistent net rule. We
know the environ
It's like "recursive make" was widely used for some reason...
Kevin
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> For those of you not following systemd-devel mailing list, here are some
> responses from Lennart regarding systemd and udev split.
>
> Original Message
> Sub
For those of you not following systemd-devel mailing list, here are some
responses from Lennart regarding systemd and udev split.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/5] build-sys: move common
libraries to separate Makefile
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:31:30 +020
