-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:49:50 -0600,
Matthew Burgess escribió:
> Apparently it should be supplied by sysvinit (see, for example,
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/i386/sysvinit-utils/filelist). It was
> apparently added in 2.86ds1-62
added to sysvin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:38:50 -0400,
Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
> Personally, I love the flexibility that chkconfig gives you, both for
> managing your scripts and for being able to quickly modify their
> parameters without having to slave over symlink
On 08/10/2010 11:40 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 8/10/10 4:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> If there were updates to the bootscripts to make them LSB compliant, I
>> would support that. I think that the chkconfig program should be
>> deferred to BLFS though.
>
>
> I even patch my jhalfs copy of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/2010 03:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> Hey All,
>>
>> So with my LightCube OS project (which is actually nearing first alpha
>> release), I am at the point where I need to decide what to do for boot
>> scripts. I have
On 8/10/10 6:49 PM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Having got so used to doing this at work just recently, I wondered why LFS
> didn't have the
> 'service' binary. Apparently it should be supplied by sysvinit (see, for
> example,
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/i386/sysvinit-utils/filelist). It wa
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 18:49, Matthew Burgess
wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:38:50 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork
> wrote:
>
>> Another request for inclusion would be a wrapper script for the
>> bootscripts like fedora's 'service' which essentially just calls the
>> appropriate script with parameters
I've only been partially following this thread, I don't use "package
users". On subject of extracting dependencies, there was some work done
by Manuel a few years back for JHALFS - If I recall correctly he was
working toward regenerating a dependency based copy of BLFS (targeted
toward KDE or
Hey Matt,
Awesome, got it working, thanks :-) To get rid of that trailing "p:
jadetex", I just piped the result through `head --lines=-1'.
One issue seems to be the processing time, which is a bit lengthy.
However, if I put this in a script, I can set the script to run in the
background, so that
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:38:50 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork
wrote:
> Another request for inclusion would be a wrapper script for the
> bootscripts like fedora's 'service' which essentially just calls the
> appropriate script with parameters so one can type:
>
> service name start
Having got so used to
On 8/10/10 4:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> If there were updates to the bootscripts to make them LSB compliant, I
> would support that. I think that the chkconfig program should be
> deferred to BLFS though.
Possibly, except that the scripts themselves should have chkconfig
parameters in them - an
Selon Jeremy Huntwork :
> FYI,
>
> The new version of sysvinit you've added to the dev book includes a
> binary not listed in the book (at least on x86_64, I assume it's not
> arch-specific): /sbin/fstab-decode
>
> Jeremy
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
> FAQ: http://ww
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> So with my LightCube OS project (which is actually nearing first alpha
> release), I am at the point where I need to decide what to do for boot
> scripts. I have been using LFS and BLFS scripts up to now, but I'm not
> sure if I will continue to do so in th
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> FYI,
>
> The new version of sysvinit you've added to the dev book includes a
> binary not listed in the book (at least on x86_64, I assume it's not
> arch-specific): /sbin/fstab-decode
OK, I'll add it to the index.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/li
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:26:18 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork
wrote:
> FYI,
>
> The new version of sysvinit you've added to the dev book includes a
> binary not listed in the book (at least on x86_64, I assume it's not
> arch-specific): /sbin/fstab-decode
Thanks Jeremy. Just to confirm, it's not arch-sp
Hey All,
So with my LightCube OS project (which is actually nearing first alpha
release), I am at the point where I need to decide what to do for boot
scripts. I have been using LFS and BLFS scripts up to now, but I'm not
sure if I will continue to do so in the future.
(I also played with syst
FYI,
The new version of sysvinit you've added to the dev book includes a
binary not listed in the book (at least on x86_64, I assume it's not
arch-specific): /sbin/fstab-decode
Jeremy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:45:00 +1000 (EST), "Timothy Rice"
wrote:
>> The attached XSLT should do what you need, although it probably doesn't
>> match the format
>> you would like. Just run it as:
>>
>> xsltproc --xinclude /path/to/blfs-checkout/index.xml dependencies.xml
>
> Hey Matt,
>
> Thanks
Hi,
From: Corstiaan Hol
Subject: Grub 1.98 hangs during install
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 15:21:01 +0200
> Sorry i posted this on lfs-book instead of lfs-dev so here is a repost
>
> Hello all,
>
> after a drive crash I now rebuilded my LFS on a new HDD,
>
> the drive is partitioned like this:
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
