On 8/10/10 4:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > If there were updates to the bootscripts to make them LSB compliant, I > would support that. I think that the chkconfig program should be > deferred to BLFS though.
Possibly, except that the scripts themselves should have chkconfig parameters in them - and since they are really two halves of the same whole, if you do it in one spot, you should do it for the other. Personally, I love the flexibility that chkconfig gives you, both for managing your scripts and for being able to quickly modify their parameters without having to slave over symlink creation/modification. Another request for inclusion would be a wrapper script for the bootscripts like fedora's 'service' which essentially just calls the appropriate script with parameters so one can type: service name start instead of /etc/rc.d/init.d/name start Sure you can use bash completion, but that's still more typing in the end with all the directories to pass through :) Jeremy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
