Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Hey All, > > So with my LightCube OS project (which is actually nearing first alpha > release), I am at the point where I need to decide what to do for boot > scripts. I have been using LFS and BLFS scripts up to now, but I'm not > sure if I will continue to do so in the future. > > (I also played with systemd, which is really cool, but it's not 100% > yet, in my opinion, nor does my OS generally need it, due to its goals). > > It depends on a couple of things, really. Firstly, what's the goal of > LSB compliance with the scripts, and how far away is that? I want to > meet that, if possible. > > Secondly, is there any likelyhood that LFS/BLFS will want to adopt > chkconfig for their scripts. It's dead easy to set up, but it does > require modifying the scripts to contain runlevel and order information, > and a description (no big deal, really). chkconfig also is a super small > package with no need to use crazy dependencies (unless you want to use > the semi-graphical ntsysv program). > > Thoughts?
If there were updates to the bootscripts to make them LSB compliant, I would support that. I think that the chkconfig program should be deferred to BLFS though. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
