Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Using 2.6.18 appears to potentially affect binaries built
against kernels older than that and run on a LFS-6.5 or later
system
> Alright. I've enabled the PDF section in the nightly LFS render script.
> I'm running it through cron ahead of schedule in a few minutes to make
> sure it's able to find all the JDK, FOP and FAI stuff.
>
That seems to work properly now. PDF is added to the nightly generated
files.
While
> Looking at the dingbats, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dingbat, I don't see
> where
> italic or bold dingbats make sense. We can just ignore these warnings.
>
>
Alright. I've enabled the PDF section in the nightly LFS render script.
I'm running it through cron ahead of schedule in a few m
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> May 26, 2009 8:03:58 PM org.apache.fop.fonts.FontInfo notifyFontReplacement
> WARNING: Font 'Symbol,normal,700' not found. Substituting with
> 'Symbol,normal,400'.
>
> May 26, 2009 8:03:58 PM org.apache.fop.fonts.FontInfo notifyFontReplacement
> WARNING: Font 'ZapfDingba
The line overflow has been fixed by creating individual index entries
rather than one long one in shell-syntax presentation. Makes it easier
to read as well as discussed elsewhere in this thread.
Gerard
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.or
> Some lines are wrapped, but one or more of the 3 lines that have:
>
> /usr/include/{asm{,-generic},drm,linux,mtd,rdma,sound,video}/*.h
>
> are causing the problem. We can probably fix it by breaking that up into
> multiple entries in the seglist item and multiple varlistentry items.
>
That
> Go for it. I've gost several other items working.
>
>
Working on it right now.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> I think I found it. In the very last page of the index:
>>
>> # /usr/include/{asm{,-generic},drm,linux,mtd, rdma,sound,video}/*.h:
>> Linux-2.6.29.4 API Headers
>>
> While I appreciate the way that's written, it's hardly readable and it
> does take a few careful loo
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> I tried running make pdf on quantum, but got:
>>
>> /bin/sh: fop: command not found
>>
>
> I didn't add the JDK and FOP directories to the global $PATH yet.
>
> Add the appropriate lines to your .bash_profile or .bashrc:
>
> PATH=$PATH:/usr/fop
> export JAVA_HOME=/op
> I think I found it. In the very last page of the index:
>
> # /usr/include/{asm{,-generic},drm,linux,mtd, rdma,sound,video}/*.h:
> Linux-2.6.29.4 API Headers
>
While I appreciate the way that's written, it's hardly readable and it
does take a few careful looks to actually construct the fi
> I tried running make pdf on quantum, but got:
>
> /bin/sh: fop: command not found
>
I didn't add the JDK and FOP directories to the global $PATH yet.
Add the appropriate lines to your .bash_profile or .bashrc:
PATH=$PATH:/usr/fop
export JAVA_HOME=/opt/jdk
export ANT_HOME=/opt/ant
and to .
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> I looked for the overflow, but couldn't find it. I would have thought it
>> might
>> have been one of the boot or udev scripts, but I didn't spot the problem.
>> You
>> might look at the lfs-pdf.fo and see if you can get to block 1824. I think
>> that
>> 1pt == 10
> Gerard, I took the liberty of making several grammar/wording changes in the
> preface. If you are OK with them, I think you can close #2326.
>
> I've been going over the book for a couple of days now and no 3rd person text
> jumped out to me. We may be OK with #2092 also. We can always make q
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> #2326Modifications to Preface gerard
>>
>> Some changes have been made. Waiting for final review to close.
>>
>> #2092 Switch all text back from third person to second person pronouns
>> gerard
>>
>> Some fixes have been made. We can probably promote thi
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> I looked for the overflow, but couldn't find it. I would have thought it
>> might
>> have been one of the boot or udev scripts, but I didn't spot the problem.
>> You
>> might look at the lfs-pdf.fo and see if you can get to block 1824. I think
>> that
>> 1pt == 10
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> #2326Modifications to Preface gerard
>>
>> Some changes have been made. Waiting for final review to close.
>>
>> #2092 Switch all text back from third person to second person pronouns
>> gerard
>>
>> Some fixes have been made. We can probably promote thi
> I looked for the overflow, but couldn't find it. I would have thought it
> might
> have been one of the boot or udev scripts, but I didn't spot the problem.
> You
> might look at the lfs-pdf.fo and see if you can get to block 1824. I think
> that
> 1pt == 1000mpt == 1/72 inch so we are
roblem in a paragraph.
>
> Generated PDF is here:
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~gerard/LFS-BOOK-20090526.pdf
>
> Have a look, see if you can spot any obvious issues. If it appears
> decent the daily snapshots can include PDFs again.
>
> The warnings mentioned earlier on this fi
Hiya,
I can't remember if there was an ulterior motive for this or not. After
generating the book, a few temporary files were left behind:
- lfs-full.xml
- lfs-html.xml
- lfs-pdf.fo
- lfs-pdf.xml
These files are all removed by the 'tmpdir' target that runs just before
'validxml' so it's not a
://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~gerard/LFS-BOOK-20090526.pdf
Have a look, see if you can spot any obvious issues. If it appears
decent the daily snapshots can include PDFs again.
The warnings mentioned earlier on this first attempt are as follows.
May 26, 2009 8:03:58 PM org.apache.fop.fonts.FontInfo
> #2326 Modifications to Preface gerard
>
> Some changes have been made. Waiting for final review to close.
>
> #2092 Switch all text back from third person to second person pronouns
> gerard
>
> Some fixes have been made. We can probably promote this to 6.5
>
>
Agreed on #
Hi Emmanuel,
> It seems that the attachement has been remove. So here is the patch.
>
Patch came through properly the first time around, at least on my end.
I have added the patch to the corresponding Trac ticket. The suggested
edits seem pretty straight-forward and I don't think there are a
On Tue, 26 May 2009 14:26:56 -0600, Matthew Burgess
wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2009 14:32:48 -0500, Bruce Dubbs
> wrote:
>>
>> #2398Coreutils-7.4 fails 2 stty tests unassigned
>>
>> I could not duplicate this problem. I recommend closing, but Matt
>> should do it.
>
> Thanks, Bruce. Bef
Le Tue, 26 May 2009 15:45:30 -0500,
Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Emmanuel Trillaud wrote:
> > I am currently translating some hints in french, including the
> > optimization one. I was planning to proposed a patch soon to update
> > the hint and I saw your status report on LFS 6.5.
> >
> >> #2414
Le Tue, 26 May 2009 15:45:30 -0500,
Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Emmanuel Trillaud wrote:
> > I am currently translating some hints in french, including the
> > optimization one. I was planning to proposed a patch soon to update
> > the hint and I saw your status report on LFS 6.5.
> >
> >> #2414
Emmanuel Trillaud wrote:
> I am currently translating some hints in french, including the
> optimization one. I was planning to proposed a patch soon to update the
> hint and I saw your status report on LFS 6.5.
>
>> #2414 Evaluate Optimization hint unassigned
> here is some things that
I am currently translating some hints in french, including the
optimization one. I was planning to proposed a patch soon to update the
hint and I saw your status report on LFS 6.5.
> #2414 Evaluate Optimization hint unassigned
here is some things that could be change :
* the hint seem
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>>> Using 2.6.18 appears to potentially affect binaries built against kernels
>>> older
>>> than that and run on a LFS-6.5 or later system. I don't see where that
On Tue, 26 May 2009 14:32:48 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> #2398 Coreutils-7.4 fails 2 stty tests unassigned
>
> I could not duplicate this problem. I recommend closing, but Matt should
> do it.
Thanks, Bruce. Before I close this, I'd like a shout out from anyone using
either VirtualB
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> The reason I saw was so code didn't have to check for certain features at run
>> time. The would be to make things easier for the programmers. 2.6.18
>> corresponds to RHEL 5 and is a compromis
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&group=milestone&order=id
This is a progress report on what remains for LFS-6.5:
#1929Use 'make install', when it can work, instead of 'cp', when installing
single files.bdubbs
I haven't heard any feedb
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Bryan Kadzban
>> wrote:
>>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
--enable-kernel=VERSION compile for compatibility with kernel not older
than
VERSION
>>> Yes: abort any program at star
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bruce Dubbs" To:
>> Using 2.6.18 appears to potentially affect binaries built against kernels
>> older than that and run on a LFS-6.5 or later system. I don't see where
>> that would be an issue.
> No. The issue is that if you ha
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: glibc-2.10.1 make check fails
...
>
> Using 2.6.18 appears to potentially affect binaries built against kernels
older
> than that and run on a LFS-6.5 or later sy
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Bryan Kadzban
> wrote:
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> --enable-kernel=VERSION compile for compatibility with kernel not older than
>>>VERSION
>> Yes: abort any program at startup if the current kernel version is less
>> than VERSION, and also
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Nicholson"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: glibc-2.10.1 make check fails
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Bryan Kadzban
> wrote:
> > Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> --enable-kernel=VERSION compile for compat
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Bryan Kadzban
wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> --enable-kernel=VERSION compile for compatibility with kernel not older than
>> VERSION
>
> Yes: abort any program at startup if the current kernel version is less
> than VERSION, and also remove any workarounds incl
37 matches
Mail list logo
