Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov
>> For a regular distro, I would agree. For a third-party LiveCD, I disagree.
>
> I still don't think instructions should be special for this situation.
> If you chose a host that doesn't provide the necessary developmen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Clarke
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 11:03 PM
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
Subject: RE: SVN-20080403 : 5.6.1. Installation of Glibc failure
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Clarke
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 8:22 PM
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: SVN-20080403 : 5.6.1. Installation of Glibc failure
>
>
>> Loren Foret wrote:
>>> More like linux
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> This comes up occasionally because users do not read section iv.
>
> "Your host system should have the following software with the minimum
> versions indicated."
>
> and
>
> "To see whether your host system has all the appropriate versions, run
> the following:"
>
> Reread
>
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> It may be reasonable to include a line or two for RISC (PPC/ARM etc) based
> people that may get different output from compiling that dummy.c code.
>
That's essentially what that Important note at the top of the page, and
its link to Toolchain Technical Notes, does.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Clarke
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 8:22 PM
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
Subject: Re: SVN-20080403 : 5.6.1. Installation of Glibc failure
> Loren Foret wrote:
>> More like linux from any distro.
>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 6:20 PM
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
Subject: Re: SVN-20080403 : 5.6.1. Installation of Glibc failure
Loren Foret wrote:
> More like linux from any distro.
But I think the
Joe wrote:
> Loren Foret wrote:
>> More like linux from any distro.
> But I think the point is that some distros now come with, for example,
> dash as the default shell linked to /bin/sh, or as the OP apparently
> found, mawk as the default AWK interpreter. If LFS is to become "more
> than a boo
> Loren Foret wrote:
>> More like linux from any distro.
> But I think the point is that some distros now come with, for example,
> dash as the default shell linked to /bin/sh, or as the OP apparently
> found, mawk as the default AWK interpreter. If LFS is to become "more
> than a book", it may be
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> It may be reasonable to include a line or two for RISC (PPC/ARM etc) based
> people that may get different output from compiling that dummy.c code.
Sure, if you're willing to continue to provide the appropriate data. :)
Of course, a balance needs to be struck, too. More tha
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> As I'm going through the book, I realized I couldn't place why e2fsprogs
>> is built in chapter 5. The description about udev needing its headers
>> makes no sense to me...
>
> util-linux-ng needs either libblkid from e2fsprogs or libvolum
Loren Foret wrote:
> More like linux from any distro.
But I think the point is that some distros now come with, for example,
dash as the default shell linked to /bin/sh, or as the OP apparently
found, mawk as the default AWK interpreter. If LFS is to become "more
than a book", it may be worthwhi
I get different, and correct, output from the common sense check.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/lfs/sources/build$ mkdir foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/lfs/sources/build$ cd foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/lfs/sources/build/foo$ echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/lfs/sources/build/foo$ cc dummy.c
[
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Dubbs
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 3:58 PM
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
Subject: Re: SVN-20080403 : 5.6.1. Installation of Glibc failure
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> What is Linux From "Scratch" all abou
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> What is Linux From "Scratch" all about? Linux From "Some Distro" ?
No, it's Linux And Other Useful Programs From Source. If we wanted to
get pedantic, we could start from an assembler and build a compiler and
then the rest. The starting point is somewhat arbitrary and w
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> >> > You really need gawk, not mawk.
>> >>
>> >> Then ple
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >> > You really need gawk, not mawk.
> >>
> >> Then please add gawk
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> > You really need gawk, not mawk.
>>
>> Then please add gawk and bison in Chapter 5 before binutils, to accomodate
>> Debian-based LiveCDs and PCLinuxOS, respectiv
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:51 PM, J. Greenlees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> >> You really need gawk, not mawk.
> >>
> >
> > Then please add gawk and bison in Chapter 5 before binutils, to accomodate
> > Debian-based LiveCDs and PCLin
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > You really need gawk, not mawk.
>
> Then please add gawk and bison in Chapter 5 before binutils, to accomodate
> Debian-based LiveCDs and PCLinuxOS, respectively.
The host requirements sp
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
>> You really need gawk, not mawk.
>>
>
> Then please add gawk and bison in Chapter 5 before binutils, to accomodate
> Debian-based LiveCDs and PCLinuxOS, respectively.
and here I was thinking that a note that bison is required to be
in
21 matches
Mail list logo
