Re: Pre-generating persistent-net rules

2007-11-18 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
2007/11/19, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There may be cases other than wireless devices where the type attribute > needs to be used. Or at least, the upstream persistent-net-generator > file seems to add that attribute for everything. I don't know if that > means that it's actually needed

is texinfo-4.11 ready for 'prime time' in LFS?

2007-11-18 Thread Julio Meca Hansen
> A quick check of Binutils sources suggests that is correct. Could you > try the attached patch please, and confirm if it works with > Texinfo-4.11? Sure, I'll perform a quick reconstruction of the test partition and let you know how well (or bad) it goes... Regards, Julio PS. Sorry if the mes

Re: is texinfo-4.11 ready for 'prime time' in LFS?

2007-11-18 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:18:52 +0100, Julio Meca Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After some time examining the mailing lists for binutils at > sourceware.org, I found that the bug has been resolved. A quick check of Binutils sources suggests that is correct. Could you try the attached patch p

Re: is texinfo-4.11 ready for 'prime time' in LFS?

2007-11-18 Thread Julio Meca Hansen
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 14:53 -0700, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:47:12 +0100, Julio Meca Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > The last information that can be extracted from the LFS Trac for ticket > > #2074 (texinfo-4.11) stated that we had to wait until gcc-4.2.2 was out, >

Re: is texinfo-4.11 ready for 'prime time' in LFS?

2007-11-18 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:47:12 +0100, Julio Meca Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The last information that can be extracted from the LFS Trac for ticket > #2074 (texinfo-4.11) stated that we had to wait until gcc-4.2.2 was out, > now gcc is out and in fact used in the development branch of the bo

Re: Pre-generating persistent-net rules

2007-11-18 Thread Bryan Kadzban
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > 2007/11/17, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> A) We need to generate the rules, obviously. We don't want the >> user to boot their LFS system for the first time without any rules >> in existence, because they've

Re: Gawk-3.1.6 LC_MESSAGES and LANGINFO_CODESET

2007-11-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Erik-Jan wrote: > Hi, > > In Gawk-3.1.6, LC_MESSAGES and LANGINFO_CODESET are detected/set during > configure, so the cat to config.h isn't needed anymore. A ticket has been submitted to remind us to check this out. Thanks for the report. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list

Gawk-3.1.6 LC_MESSAGES and LANGINFO_CODESET

2007-11-18 Thread Erik-Jan
Hi, In Gawk-3.1.6, LC_MESSAGES and LANGINFO_CODESET are detected/set during configure, so the cat to config.h isn't needed anymore. Bye Erik-Jan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Glibc: --enable=kernel=???

2007-11-18 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
2007/11/18, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:44:20PM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > 2007/11/14, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > My initial reaction is to use either current or 2.6.2, with 2.6.2 > > > (slightly) preferred. > > > > -1 for "current", beca

Re: Pre-generating persistent-net rules

2007-11-18 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
2007/11/17, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > A) We need to generate the rules, obviously. We don't want the user to > boot their LFS system for the first time without any rules in existence, > because they've already configured their NICs in chapter 7. I disagree. We need to create, not neces

is texinfo-4.11 ready for 'prime time' in LFS?

2007-11-18 Thread Julio Meca Hansen
The last information that can be extracted from the LFS Trac for ticket #2074 (texinfo-4.11) stated that we had to wait until gcc-4.2.2 was out, now gcc is out and in fact used in the development branch of the book, is it ready for inclusion? I can't mention the CLFS patches for both binutils/texi