On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
Interesting!! So either GCC is not compiling Glibc with NPTL correctly, or
we have a GCC 4.0.1 issue.
Matt Darcy is trying the Currently GLIBC snapshot.
If the snapshot works well, we should seriously consider using that in the
We have had people test the GCC4 branch and it doesn't affect it, which
is kinda of strange.
To recreate the two issues we have seen, just do configure and make,
with glibc or binutils. Each issue is specific to the architecture that
what makes it harder to track down.
glibc - 32/64 on x86_6
El Jueves, 8 de Septiembre de 2005 21:32, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> Manuel, is this likely to cause problems
> for your intended docbook-xsl-1.69.1 related patches you've got planned
> for the weekend?
Don't worry about that.
The merge will implies only that I don't will need to verify the
Hi guys,
I'm planning on merging the gcc4 branch to trunk sometime between
19:00-22:00 UTC on Friday evening. Jeremy, I'll take care of merging
r6818 to the branch tonight. Manuel, is this likely to cause problems
for your intended docbook-xsl-1.69.1 related patches you've got planned
for t
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 09/08/05 14:06 CST:
> If the snapshot works well, we should seriously consider using that in
> the current gcc4 branch instead of the patches in place now.
To try and get a better understanding of the issues, can you tell me
what I need to look for to see if
Jim Gifford wrote:
Interesting!! So either GCC is not compiling Glibc with NPTL correctly,
or we have a GCC 4.0.1 issue.
Or, the current cross-lfs instructions need to be altered. As far as
I'm aware, following the gcc4 branch, noone has encountered any of the
issues yourself or Matt Darcy
Jim Gifford wrote:
Interesting!! So either GCC is not compiling Glibc with NPTL correctly,
or we have a GCC 4.0.1 issue.
Matt Darcy is trying the Currently GLIBC snapshot.
If the snapshot works well, we should seriously consider using that in
the current gcc4 branch instead of the patches
Now to add the twist to this tail. During testing I've personally seen
some wierd stuff with GCC 4.0.1, Glibc 2.3.5, and Binutils 2.16.1.
When I built an x86 to x86 system following the book exactly, I get to
binutils and I would get a Malformed Archive on all binutils static
libraries. Repeat
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Olivier Seubert wrote:
Yeah, you asked this on -support yesterday, and I replied that the
config.log you need to look at is in the libstdc++-v3 directory. If you
didn't seem my response, it should be in the archives. Please take this
back to lfs-support.
Ken
--
das ein
Hi,
I 'm trying to build Linux from Scratch as it is
described in the Online-Book (version for gcc4.01).
In chapter 6.14 when I try to "make" the binaries, the
isntallation stops with this error message:
.
.
.
make[2]: Entering directory `/sources/gcc-build/gcc'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `
10 matches
Mail list logo
