Matt we could change these to perl expressions instead of sed.
http://www.student.northpark.edu/pemente/sed/sedfaq4.html#s4.41.1
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Michael Kipper wrote:
Hi, have a wierd problem (?) building LFS on x86_64.
Configuring like:
./configure \
--build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu \
--prefix=/usr \
--libdir=/usr/lib64 \
--with-shared \
--without-debug
Results in:
1486 entries written to /usr/share/term
Hi, have a wierd problem (?) building LFS on x86_64.
Configuring like:
./configure \
--build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu \
--prefix=/usr \
--libdir=/usr/lib64 \
--with-shared \
--without-debug
Results in:
1486 entries written to /usr/share/terminfo
** built new /u
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Actually, we do have it correct, (look at the sparc64 book), but
apparently the x86 book was mangled a little bit with our recent
re-structuring. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I'll fix it in
just a minute.
There. Take a look:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jh
Matthew Burgess wrote:
John Profic wrote:
1) my version of sed do not support -i switch at all (it is 3.0.2)
and I used method (cp file file-ORIG; sed ... file-ORIG > file) seen
in cross-lfs (scripts) to workaround this
That suggests your host is really old, though I suppose the whole
poi
Greg Schafer wrote:
John Profic wrote:
2) at time of writing my system is only building full glibc from
cross-tools part, but there was one problem already. Cross-tools part
missing one stage in cross-tools: installing glibc headers to /tools
(gcc static build fails complaining about non exi
John Profic wrote:
> 2) at time of writing my system is only building full glibc from
> cross-tools part, but there was one problem already. Cross-tools part
> missing one stage in cross-tools: installing glibc headers to /tools
> (gcc static build fails complaining about non existence of pthre
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> John Profic wrote:
>
>> 1) my version of sed do not support -i switch at all (it is 3.0.2) and
>> I used method (cp file file-ORIG; sed ... file-ORIG > file) seen in
>> cross-lfs (scripts) to workaround this
>
>
> That suggests your host is really old, though I suppose t
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Do we need a script for it though? I've not tested it yet (of course!
> :) ), but this is what I was thinking:
>
> KERNEL="rtc", ACTION="add", \
> RUN="echo 1024 > /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq"
> KERNEL="eth0", ACTION="add", \
> RUN="echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
I'll keep that in mind and work it in as I make other edits, if that's
alright with you.
Fine by me :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Jim/Jeremy, could you audit all occurences of 'sed' prior to chapter
6.17 (sed-4.1.4 installation) and remove the '-i' flag please? Either
that or we need to have modern 'sed' built really early on.
I'll keep that in mind and work it in as I make other edits, if that'
John Profic wrote:
1) my version of sed do not support -i switch at all (it is 3.0.2) and I
used method (cp file file-ORIG; sed ... file-ORIG > file) seen in
cross-lfs (scripts) to workaround this
That suggests your host is really old, though I suppose the whole point
of cross-lfs is to expan
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 09:54, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've just put up a new livecd iso. This is version x86-6.1-1-pre3. There
> ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs-livecd/lfslivecd-x86-6.1-1.pre3.iso
I think this should be:
ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs-livecd/lfslivecd-x86-6.1
Hello,
I'm currently building cross-lfs (book) using today's morning snapshot
(building for x86_64), and haver following problems:
(need to mention that I'm building on rather old system - it was build
over three yers ago on old machine (for i386) and copied to new on)
1) my version of sed do no
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs-livecd/lfslivecd-x86-6.1-1.pre3.iso
Grr.
A small typo in that url above:
Should be:
ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs-livecd/lfslivecd-x86-6.1-1-pre3.iso
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.lin
Hey all,
I've just put up a new livecd iso. This is version x86-6.1-1-pre3. There
are still a few known missing items that we will put in the next iso,
and hopefully that one will be a release candidate. However, there are
some substantially new features with this cd, so we wanted to give the
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
KERNEL="rtc", RUN="/path/to/the/script"
Do we need a script for it though? I've not tested it yet (of course!
:) ), but this is what I was thinking:
KERNEL="rtc", ACTION="add", \
RUN="echo 1024 > /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq"
KERNEL="eth0", ACTION="add", \
RUN="
Jim Gifford wrote:
> May needs some more changes for udev 058 and 2.6.12 kernel. Will check
> it out.
>
>
>
> Subject:
> [ANNOUNCE] udev 058 release
> From:
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Also, the rules file structure a
Ag Hatzim wrote:
Since in LFS,we dont have a package manager to synchronize the package database,
i think it would be very usefull a new list dedicated for to monitor new
releases
from the packages that belongs to the LFS/BLFS.
Well, I generally keep track of new package releases simply by
mo
Jim Gifford([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sat, May 21, 2005 at 08:56:38PM -0700:
>
..
>
Hi.
First sorry if my post doesnt belong in this list and sorry Jim if i
hijacked your own thread ...but with the occasion of your forwarded
message,i would like to make a proposal.
Since in LFS,we dont have a pac
20 matches
Mail list logo
