Another showstopper from e2fsprogs-1.35:
/lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [test_icount] Error 1
make[2]:
Archaic wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:02:45PM -0800, Jim Gifford wrote:
Archaic,
Try this patch.
http://cvs.pld.org.pl/shadow/libmisc/log.c?r1=1.7&r2=1.8
That patch did the job.
Here is an LFS'd version of the patch. The above doesn't apply due to a
timestamp in the patch.
I'm CC'ing
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:02:45PM -0800, Jim Gifford wrote:
> Archaic,
>Try this patch.
> http://cvs.pld.org.pl/shadow/libmisc/log.c?r1=1.7&r2=1.8
That patch did the job.
Here is an LFS'd version of the patch. The above doesn't apply due to a
timestamp in the patch.
I'm CC'ing hlfs-dev as I
Robert Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On March 21, 2005 10:13 pm, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> Robert Connolly wrote:
>> > Hi. Uhm, using glibc-20050321.
>>
>> Which binutils version? Since the error is coming from ld, I would
Ahha. Using ld version 2.15.96 20050308 and all is well (no error). So, use:
ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.15.96.tar.bz2
if you want to use the latest Glibc.
BTW, I think FSF binutils-2.16 is scheduled for April.
robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
On March 21, 2005 10:13 pm, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Robert Connolly wrote:
> > Hi. Uhm, using glibc-20050321.
>
> Which binutils version? Since the error is coming from ld, I would
> suspect that it's binutils first (though that's basically a guess).
$ ld --version
Robert Connolly wrote:
Hi. Uhm, using glibc-20050321.
Which binutils version? Since the error is coming from ld, I would
suspect that it's binutils first (though that's basically a guess).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/li
Hi. Uhm, using glibc-20050321. I get this in chapter 5's adjusting:
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ cc dummy.c
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:/mnt/lf
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 03/21/05 20:08 CST:
>
> Ok, I was just hoping you had that test system still in place.
I have tar files of an LFS-SVN-20050316 build and available partitions.
If you'd like I can create a new LFS in 10 minutes, then install
shadow with the patch to see what happen
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 03/21/05 18:34 CST:
Randy, did you try the patch I posted???
No, I did not. I figured this is an LFS issue more than a BLFS
issue, so I just went ahead and installed PAM and re-installed
shadow without the patch. It works now.
I've not
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 03/21/05 18:34 CST:
> Randy, did you try the patch I posted???
No, I did not. I figured this is an LFS issue more than a BLFS
issue, so I just went ahead and installed PAM and re-installed
shadow without the patch. It works now.
I've not looked at any of the code
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 03/21/05 12:38 CST:
Archaic wrote these words on 03/21/05 11:41 CST:
Anyway, works for me doesn't really fix the situation. Did you deviate
in anyway? I have a standard deviation that I have done for the last 2
years as well as a 100
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 03/21/05 12:38 CST:
> Archaic wrote these words on 03/21/05 11:41 CST:
>
>>Anyway, works for me doesn't really fix the situation. Did you deviate
>>in anyway? I have a standard deviation that I have done for the last 2
>>years as well as a 100% strict by-the-boo
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:02:45PM -0800, Jim Gifford wrote:
> Archaic,
>Try this patch.
> http://cvs.pld.org.pl/shadow/libmisc/log.c?r1=1.7&r2=1.8
That looks nearly identical to the one in the patches repo. I'll get to
it ASAP. I'm at work and thus logging in remotely now, so I can't test
it.
Joachim Beckers wrote:
> That would be very nice. I understand that anduin is currently being
> updated with the packages from blfs-6.0-pre1, so you can copy them
> over form there I guess.
> I don't know exactly what you mean with that /pub/-thing, but I
> suspect that it has to do with keeping t
Justin R. Knierim wrote:
Joachim Beckers wrote:
> Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
>> As it stands right now, we haven't even changed the main LFS
profile to do auto-download from ftp.linuxfromscratch.org, and the
load generated by that will be lower than the BLFS load on anduin
(there are a lot fewer
Archaic,
Try this patch.
http://cvs.pld.org.pl/shadow/libmisc/log.c?r1=1.7&r2=1.8
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the ab
Andrew Benton wrote:
It gives the same result from a console
lastlog 2&> log
andy:~$ cat log
Username Port From Latest
root :20 Mon Mar 21 15:25:59 + 2005
andy tty1 Mon Mar 21 16:58:56 + 2005
angie
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 06:50:22PM +, Andrew Benton wrote:
> >
> It gives the same result from a console
As with Randy, if you have the configure and make logs from shadow,
could you either post them or send them to me privately?
Also, are you using PAM or for some reason recompiled shadow af
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:38:38PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Lastlog is indeed not properly recording the latest login times.
> I'm getting "Never logged in" exactly as you describe.
Do you log configure and make output? If so, I'd appreciate the logs
from your working install to compare w
Archaic wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:06:39PM +, Andrew Benton wrote:
Seems fine here
Yes, on my old systems, starting a login shell via xterm worked. Try it
from a console login.
It gives the same result from a console
lastlog 2&> log
andy:~$ cat log
Username Port From
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi Jim,
You wrote:
I have been working on getting wireless working with LFS. I came up
with a bootscript package that works. If you guys won't mind, I could
create the necessary BLFS pages to assist you. If your
interested let me know.
I too have done quite a bit of
Archaic wrote these words on 03/21/05 11:41 CST:
> Anyway, works for me doesn't really fix the situation. Did you deviate
> in anyway? I have a standard deviation that I have done for the last 2
> years as well as a 100% strict by-the-book build in which lastlog isn't
> recording tty times.
I jus
Archaic wrote these words on 03/21/05 11:41 CST:
> Not necessarily. For instance, if I log in via ssh it updates the port
> and the time. If I then log in via a tty, I will see the time from the
> ssh login. A cursory glance may cause one to think it is working, since
> it shows a time, but the ti
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 11:18:13AM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Works for me. Note root's last login in my lastlog output was on tty1.
Not necessarily. For instance, if I log in via ssh it updates the port
and the time. If I then log in via a tty, I will see the time from the
ssh login. A cur
Joachim Beckers wrote:
> Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
>> As it stands right now, we haven't even changed the main LFS
profile to do auto-download from ftp.linuxfromscratch.org, and the
load generated by that will be lower than the BLFS load on anduin
(there are a lot fewer packages, and not so many
Archaic wrote these words on 03/21/05 11:14 CST:
> Yes, on my old systems, starting a login shell via xterm worked. Try it
> from a console login.
Works for me. Note root's last login in my lastlog output was on tty1.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[G
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:06:39PM +, Andrew Benton wrote:
> >
> Seems fine here
Yes, on my old systems, starting a login shell via xterm worked. Try it
from a console login.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.
increase the size of your manhood
90% of males were interested in improving their sexual stamina,
performance, and the size of their manhood. Are you one of the 90%?
I was skeptical, but when I purchased my first bottle of your BLACK LABEL
FORMULA and tried them, within days I was seeing results.
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Archaic wrote these words on 03/21/05 08:54 CST:
On a testing build of 20050318, lastlog will show the last tty a person
logged in on, but shows "Never logged in". There is a patch in the
patches repo:
Could you be more specific as to what is broken?
I get this when running l
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 03/21/05 09:55 CST:
Mostly directed to the Editors, FYI for everyone else.
Apparently, Anduin did not get updated with a branch for the 6.0pre1
release. We need to create this branch so that folks looking for
BLFS-6.0 files can find them.
I
More info:
I pulled up some old versions of LFS. This problem seems to have been
around on 4.0.4.1, 4.0.6, and now 4.0.7 versions of shadow.
I have no idea why I'm just now catching it. Probably because I'm very
tentative about this current build so am checking it with a fine-toothed
comb.
--
A
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Archaic wrote these words on 03/21/05 08:54 CST:
On a testing build of 20050318, lastlog will show the last tty a person
logged in on, but shows "Never logged in". There is a patch in the
patches repo:
Could you be more specific as to what is broken?
I get this when running l
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:43:37AM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> What is the setting for lastlog_enab in /etc/login.defs, or if you're
> using PAM, the appropriate setting in your PAM configuration. I sure
> would like to figure out why mine works, and yours does not.
No PAM.
login.defs has:
Archaic wrote these words on 03/21/05 09:38 CST:
> $ lastlog
> Username Port From Latest
> root tty4 **Never logged in**
> sshd **Never logged in**
> fcron **Never lo
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:38:04AM -0700, Archaic wrote:
>
> $ lastlog
> Username Port From Latest
> root tty4 **Never logged in**
> sshd **Never logged in**
> fcron
Subject says it all. Don't know about 4.0 yet.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.ht
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:00:18AM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Could you be more specific as to what is broken?
$ lastlog
Username Port From Latest
root tty4 **Never logged in**
sshd **Never logged
Archaic wrote these words on 03/21/05 08:54 CST:
> On a testing build of 20050318, lastlog will show the last tty a person
> logged in on, but shows "Never logged in". There is a patch in the
> patches repo:
Could you be more specific as to what is broken?
I get this when running lastlog:
[EMAIL
On a testing build of 20050318, lastlog will show the last tty a person
logged in on, but shows "Never logged in". There is a patch in the
patches repo:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/shadow/shadow-4.0.4.1-lastlog_brokenness-1.patch
but Steve Crosby pointed out that it reverts
Do you want inexpensive Ambien?
http://www.qo2.net/p/viks/1/
or 160 other drugs:
http://www.qo2.net/p/viks
you formica me offshore me you crux me borrow me you axe me innuendo me you
clatter me bodyguard me you circumscription me proportion me
you brunch me ahmedabad me you arom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gerard Beekmans
I should make up some graphs one day to list all the hops and their physical
locations from an internet backbone perspective. Might be interesting and i'm
sure some of you hardcore geeks would like it :)
i'm a geek in training but i would *definitely* lo
42 matches
Mail list logo
