Robert Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On March 21, 2005 10:13 pm, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> Robert Connolly wrote:
>> > Hi. Uhm, using glibc-20050321.
>>
>> Which binutils version? Since the error is coming from ld, I would
>> suspect that it's binutils first (though that's basically a guess).
>
> $ ld --version
> GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2.2 20041220
>
> I'll snoop around FSF cvsweb and see if maybe they changed something.
>
> robert
this from redhat glibc mailing list...
===============
* Sat Mar 05 2005 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.3.4-12
- fix tst-chk{2,3}
- fix up AS_NEEDED directive in /usr/lib/libc.so
- BuildReq binutils >= 2.15.94.0.2-1 for AS_NEEDED, in
glibc-devel Conflict with binutils < 2.15.94.0.2-1
=============
so it looks like a new version of binutils will be needed to support the
glibc changes to libc.so. (the binutils version above is a redhat specific
binutils release, not the base HJL binutils version we are using).
That said, the necessary patch to binutils (from the author of the change
above) is listed in the message below, and looks like it's been approved.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-01/msg00288.html
-- -
Steve Crosby
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
