The newer version of syslog-ng right now it's 1.9, soon to be 2.0 will
also have a change in dependencies.
glib2, and the replacement of libol, eventlog libraries.
That's one of the reasons for the change. The only other solution is to
give a choice in the book, but that's not a wise decision. S
Jeremy Utley wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote:
This I don't understand. I thought syslog-ng was the new syslog
daemon of choice for LFS. If it goes away, what is destined to
replace it?
Gerard's post came as a shock to me as well, so I took the opprotunity
to ask him about it on IRC, since he happen
Randy McMurchy wrote:
This I don't understand. I thought syslog-ng was the new syslog
daemon of choice for LFS. If it goes away, what is destined to
replace it?
Gerard's post came as a shock to me as well, so I took the opprotunity
to ask him about it on IRC, since he happened to be there at th
Gerard Beekmans wrote these words on 02/20/05 21:52 CST:
> I won't dispute what you said. You laid out what the right thing is to do. It
> doesn't always get done unfortunately.
I said I wouldn't post again on this thread, so I changed the title
to reflect what my intention was in bringing this w
90% of the time it doesn't change, but your are right in the instances
it does, we should take care of it.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
On February 20, 2005 08:56 pm, Anderson Lizardo wrote:
> I changed this line
>
> render_branch trunk unstable
>
> into
>
> render_branch trunk development
>
> so the cron job can recreate the link with the correct name.
I had already made that same change a few hour
I won't dispute what you said. You laid out what the right thing is to do. It
doesn't always get done unfortunately. It's one of those things I mean to
change soon. I include myself in that because often I too am a little low on
time. It takes a few seconds to update a package's version entity,
On Sunday 20 February 2005 20:33, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> On February 20, 2005 03:46 pm, Anderson Lizardo wrote:
> > Just a note: I've changed render-lfs-book.sh to reflect this change as it
> > recreates this link on every run.
>
> Thanks. I checked the script and i thought if you just call rende
[This will be my last post on this subject. I've expressed an
opinion, not to disparage, but to encourage technical excellence.
I'll reiterate some points in this post and leave it at that.]
Jeremy Utley wrote these words on 02/20/05 19:37 CST:
> This, IMHO, is a highly optimistic view. For each
Randy McMurchy wrote:
What do you mean a bother? For almost all the packages in the
book that build in just a minute or two, it would take less
than 5 minutes to update the build entities, installed programs
and libraries in the book.
This, IMHO, is a highly optimistic view. For each upgrade,
Gerard Beekmans wrote these words on 02/20/05 18:34 CST:
> On February 20, 2005 03:17 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
>>Libol and syslog-ng don't have any program descriptions, lists,
>>diskspace used, dependencies or build times. Others that I don't
>>remember off-hand need fixing in these areas as w
On February 20, 2005 03:17 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Libol and syslog-ng don't have any program descriptions, lists,
> diskspace used, dependencies or build times. Others that I don't
> remember off-hand need fixing in these areas as well.
It's a common thing to happen. Packages are added or upg
On February 20, 2005 03:46 pm, Anderson Lizardo wrote:
> Just a note: I've changed render-lfs-book.sh to reflect this change as it
> recreates this link on every run.
Thanks. I checked the script and i thought if you just call render_branch()
with the correct alias all would be good to go. I just
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Noted in the Udev-050 instructions:
"This package does not come with a test suite."
This is not true any longer. Running 'make test' performs a test
suite of 110 individual tests.
Yes, that's actually been true for quite a while now, thanks for
bringing it up.
--
http://linux
Noted in the Udev-050 instructions:
"This package does not come with a test suite."
This is not true any longer. Running 'make test' performs a test
suite of 110 individual tests.
--
Randy
rmlinux: [GNU ld version 2.15.91.0.2 20040727] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.1]
[GNU C Library 2004-07-01 release versio
On Sunday 20 February 2005 17:07, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> The view link lfs/view/unstable/ has been changed to lfs/view/development/
> and the same change applies for the download links.
Gerard,
Just a note: I've changed render-lfs-book.sh to reflect this change as it
recreates this link on eve
Gerard Beekmans wrote these words on 02/20/05 16:04 CST:
> On February 20, 2005 02:53 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
>>The list of installed programs for the subject-labeled package is
>>not accurate for the version in SVN. This is just a heads-up in
>>case someone wants to update the book.
>
> What
On February 20, 2005 02:53 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> The list of installed programs for the subject-labeled package is
> not accurate for the version in SVN. This is just a heads-up in
> case someone wants to update the book.
What's missing?
--
Gerard Beekmans
/* If Linux doesn't have the solu
The list of installed programs for the subject-labeled package is
not accurate for the version in SVN. This is just a heads-up in
case someone wants to update the book.
--
Randy
rmlinux: [GNU ld version 2.15.91.0.2 20040727] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.1]
[GNU C Library 2004-07-01 release version 2.3.4] [Lin
Hi guys,
Now that the Testing branch use has been changed, I renamed the terms
"unstable" to "development" on the website. This means that trunk isn't
called unstable anymore as it's not entirely accurate for what we use it for.
The view link lfs/view/unstable/ has been changed to lfs/view/deve
Garrett Schure wrote:
5.21 Grep Perhaps add configure option --libdir=/tools/lib.
Fixed: glibc compilation from chroot said "working compiler support
for visibility attribute" required.
FYI, I've see this sometimes when binutils does not compile correctly
(usually because I set -O3 in its CFLAGS, w
tom wrote:
released 4.1.10 thought you like to know..
Please inform blfs-dev instead, that is if their bugzilla database
doesn't already have a related item in it
(http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org).
Please see http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/#which-list for a list of
the available mail
released 4.1.10 thought you like to know..
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
tom wrote:
I just installed mozilla and put this in my kde command line /usr/bin/mozilla
it loads but I cant connect to internet..
Konqueror works fine, am I missing something?
Try posting to blfs-support, unless of course 'ping www.google.com'
doesn't work from the command line. It might be us
I just installed mozilla and put this in my kde command line /usr/bin/mozilla
it loads but I cant connect to internet..
Konqueror works fine, am I missing something?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above infor
I just finished building a 64 bit lfs system based on
6.1-testing-20050205, with a few modifications, namely glibc-2.3.4,
bin86 and lilo so I would have a total 64 bit system. The system booted
and is running very stable.
I just wanted to thank you all for your help, I asked several questions
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Well, I'm building Unstable right now, just wrapping up Chapter 6
GCC installation. It's downhill from here. I'll go ahead and use
the new version of iproute2.
Have fun! It doesn't compile on linux-libc-headers-2.6.10.0 based
systems. That's why I've not upgraded that packa
27 matches
Mail list logo
