Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release planning

On 22/12/2016 13:19, Koen Vandeputte wrote: > > On 2016-12-21 20:13, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >> - Are there any outstanding changes? >> >>Is there important changes we should wait for before branching the >>release? Is there pending stuff in the staging trees which should >>absolutely

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release planning

On 22/12/2016 13:42, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 21 December 2016 at 20:13, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >> - Are there any outstanding changes? >> >> Is there important changes we should wait for before branching the >> release? Is there pending stuff in the staging trees which should >> absolute

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] musl: backport various post-1.1.15 fixes

please split this into 2 patches. * add new ones * refresh the rest. right now its impossible to review this as the 2 kinds of changes are intermingled John On 22/12/2016 16:11, Koen Vandeputte wrote: > Backport most important fixes up to latest HEAD > > - Refreshed patches > - Taken

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Users] [OpenWrt-Devel] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On 22/12/2016 16:57, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:58:22 -0800 (PST) > David Lang wrote: > >> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote: > >>> claiming that there is only one option and no alternatives is just >>> not constructive and wont lea

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On 22/12/2016 19:00, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote: >>> When I decided where to port my contribution I considered the "focus >>> on stability and functionality" more interesting than the "bleeding >>> edge functionality", therefore I selected LEDE. >>> Now I understand that a merge is ongoing. >>> Ca

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On 22/12/2016 19:57, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote: we did propose this as an idea, keep lede as the bleeding edge tree and >>> use openwrt as the stable release tree with long term support. the openwrt >>> folks made it a condition for the merger that this may not be the case.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release planning

On 22/12/2016 21:59, Rich Brown wrote: > Is it too soon to begin identifying/enumerating the features/packages that > will go into the 17.01 release? Thanks. > > Rich if you would do that it'd be amazing. i recall doing it myself for the last 2 releases and it is actually a huge pile of work.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: Add kmod-ethoc

On 23/12/2016 03:47, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Le 12/08/16 à 23:05, John Crispin a écrit : >> >> >> On 09/12/2016 04:31, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> Add the kernel module package for the Opencores.org Ethernet MAC, >>> depends on PHYLIB.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Help needed: IP175D + RT3662 issues on a "new" device

On 24/12/2016 17:49, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 5:17 PM, antonio rossi wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> i'll try to make this as short as possible despite the large amount of >> information needed to describe the issue: >> >> i am working on adding support to LEDE/OpenWRT

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Help needed: IP175D + RT3662 issues on a "new" device

On 24/12/2016 18:22, John Crispin wrote: > > > On 24/12/2016 17:49, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 5:17 PM, antonio rossi wrote: >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> i'll try to make this as short as possible despite the large amount

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On 27/12/2016 08:08, David Lang wrote: > On Mon, 26 Dec 2016, Kathy Giori wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:31 PM, John Crispin wrote: >>> >> [..] >>> i am still very much in favour of having 2 trees, one stable and one dev >>> tree. this w

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] Any interest in adding runit to OpenWRT?

On 27/12/2016 01:07, Martin Tippmann wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Rob Landley wrote: >> On 12/26/2016 08:05 AM, Martin Tippmann wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Denys Vlasenko >>> So TL;DR: procd is fine for init but having runit/runsvdir easily >>> usable would be a nice

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] Any interest in adding runit to OpenWRT?

On 28/12/2016 01:16, Martin Tippmann wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 9:43 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> currently procd service restart/reload can be triggered by config >> changes and network interface changes. from what i understand you are >> missing

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Help needed: IP175D + RT3662 issues on a "new" device

On 25/12/2016 14:33, Christian Lamparter wrote: > Hello, > > On Saturday, December 24, 2016 6:22:13 PM CET John Crispin wrote: >> On 24/12/2016 17:49, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 5:17 PM, antonio rossi wrote: >>>> Hi everybody

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Difference between AutoLoad vs. AutoProbe for kernel modules?

On 09/01/2017 22:51, Lucian Cristian wrote: > On 09.01.2017 15:25, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: >> Hi, >> >> While investigating an issue with module loading order¹, I discovered >> that >> some kernel packages use AutoProbe, like this: >> >> AUTOLOAD:=$(call AutoProbe,xt_hashlimit) >> >> while s

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: add support for PQI Air Pen

Hi, comments inline On 09/01/2017 02:41, YuheiOKAWA wrote: > SoC: AR9331 > Ethernet x1, Wireless 2.4G, uSD card slot x1. > USB Power, include Li-Po Battery. > could be a bit more verbose here > Signed-off-by: YuheiOKAWA > --- > target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds | 4 + > ...

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] Curl: fix HTTPS network timeouts with OpenSSL

Hi, On 08/01/2017 15:29, Stijn Segers wrote: > Fixes HTTPS timeouts with OpenSSL. Upstream curl bug #1174. > > Upstream commit message: > > Fixed an old leftover use of the USE_SSLEAY define which would make a > socket get removed from the applications sockets to monitor when the > multi_socket

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Difference between AutoLoad vs. AutoProbe for kernel modules?

On 10/01/2017 09:17, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 07:56:36AM +0100, John Crispin wrote: >>>> While investigating an issue with module loading order¹, I discovered >>>> that >>>> some kernel packages use AutoProbe, like this: &g

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Difference between AutoLoad vs. AutoProbe for kernel modules?

On 10/01/2017 10:53, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: > On 01/10/2017 09:20 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 10/01/2017 09:17, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 07:56:36AM +0100, John Crispin wrote: >>>>>> While investigating an issue with

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Difference between AutoLoad vs. AutoProbe for kernel modules?

On 10/01/2017 12:11, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 10 January 2017 at 18:27, John Crispin wrote: >> correct, which is why we tend to add subsystem and lib stuff using >> AutoLoad and the rest using AutoProbe > > I think the problem with wireguard in github issue 3790 [1

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Adding new people in patchwork?

On 15/01/2017 05:22, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hi, > > How do we get new people added to the delegation list in patchwork? > > Thanks! > whats your userid ? John ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: add Abicom SC300M support

Hi, looks good, one minor nitpicks inline On 11/01/2017 17:19, Conor O'Gorman wrote: > Support Abicom International Scorpion SC300M Module > > QCA9550 700MHz Extended Temperature Range > 256MB DDR2 > 256MB Nand Flash > 16MB SPI Flash > 802.11a/na/b/g/ng > GPIO x 22, USB x2, PCIe x2 > 10/100/1000

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: add Abicom SC450 support

Hi, this patch sits on top of the other and has the same ordering issue. John On 12/01/2017 23:25, Conor O'Gorman wrote: > Support Abicom International Scorpion SC450 Board > > QCA9550 700MHz Extended Temperature Range > 256MB DDR2 > 256MB NAND Flash > 16MB NOR Flash > 10/100/1000 Ether

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2 09/14] rt2x00: rt2x00pci: set PCI MWI only if supported

On 16/01/2017 12:42, Daniel Golle wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:08:57AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:06:25AM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote: >>> From: Claudio Mignanti >>> >>> This is needed for devices without support for PCI MWI. See also >>> https://

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx/ath79: mark soft_config as writeable in mach-rb941.c

Hi please fix the subject, git log --oneline target/linux/ar71xx will tell you the correct format amd ... On 18/01/2017 01:24, ha...@slashdirt.org wrote: > From: Thibaut VARENE > > This is necessary for rbcfg to work. this description is pointless ;) please add something better John

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Syslog-ng Makefile typo

Hi, although the content of the patch looks good the format is incorrect. you really want to generate the patch using git and then use git format-patch/send-email to export and mail it. we cannot merge it in this format i am afraid. please also make sure to add a Signed-off-by line John

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH ubox] kmodloader: support '-q' quiet option

On 27/01/2017 11:33, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > The kernel opportunistically attempts to load modules in advanced with > 'predicted' module names. Often these modules don't exist and hence > kmodloader produces lots of logfile noise. The kernel commandline to > modprobe from kworker proce

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH ubox] kmodloader: support '-q' quiet option

On 27/01/2017 11:38, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > > > On 27/01/17 10:36, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 27/01/2017 11:33, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: >>> The kernel opportunistically attempts to load modules in advanced with >>> 'p

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/2] target/generic: update settings of mx25u3235f

On 01/02/2017 22:32, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 1 February 2017 at 22:08, André Valentin wrote: >> This patch enabled 4K, dual and quad read. Settings have been verified with >> a real device. > > Please send it to linux-mtd for upstream inclusion first. > this patch is the result of an upstre

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ramips: fix AR670W partition alignment

On 05/02/2017 09:59, Claudio Leite wrote: > mtdsplit_lzma requires that the rootfs be aligned to a block boundary. > Pad the kernel partition to make this so. > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite > --- > target/linux/ramips/image/rt288x.mk | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ramips: fix AR670W partition alignment

On 05/02/2017 14:26, Mathias Kresin wrote: > 05.02.2017 10:15, John Crispin: >> >> >> On 05/02/2017 09:59, Claudio Leite wrote: >>> mtdsplit_lzma requires that the rootfs be aligned to a block boundary. >>> Pad the kernel partition to make this s

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [LEDE 17.01] arc770: backport upstream fix for unaligned access

el here > later down the line. > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin > Cc: Felix Fietkau > Cc: John Crispin > Cc: Jo-Philipp Wich > --- > ...-bug-in-unaligned-access-delay-slot-fixup.patch | 38 > ++ > ...revert-unaligned-access-delay-corne

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [LEDE 17.01] ubox: update hash for ubox-2017-01-15-5649c028.tar.xz

match expected > ae77504a4397f92173a7646fa3555e5b51abd7ff1dd1c419770223359e41937a > > So we update checksum. > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin > Cc: John Crispin > --- > package/system/ubox/Makefile | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/package/system/ubox/

Re: [LEDE-DEV] procd: service instance restart does not wait for old process to be closed before lanching the new one

On 08/02/2017 15:55, Alin Năstac wrote: > Hi John, > > One of the daemons I use takes sometime a couple of seconds to close > after receiving SIGTERM, so when I issue "/etc/init.d/mydaemon > restart" there will be 2 instances of that service running in parallel > until the initial instance will

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns] Change dns_send_question function arg from unicast to multicast

o follow. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki Acked-by: John Crispin feel free to push the changes to the repo > --- > announce.c | 2 +- > cache.c | 6 +++--- > dns.c | 4 ++-- > dns.h | 2 +- > interface.c | 4 ++-- > ubus.c | 4 ++-

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns] Add simple "Fall through" comment to the announce_timer function switch

On 08/02/2017 15:20, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > It's a common practice to add such comments to make it clear break > instruction was skipped on purpose. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki Acked-by: John Crispin feel free to push

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [LEDE 17.01] ubox: update hash for ubox-2017-01-15-5649c028.tar.xz

On 08/02/2017 16:22, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi John, > > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 16:20 +0100, John Crispin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> superseded by a procd update in my staging tree. > > Ok I just wanted to make sure we may build reliably everything from > the very

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns] Rename service_reply_a to dns_reply_a and move it to proper file

On 08/02/2017 16:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > This function doesn't really do anything service specify, it just sends > an A(AAA) records. It could probably be used even without any services > registered. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki Ack

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: GPIO driver backport

On 31/01/2017 18:19, Daniel Gonzalez Cabanelas wrote: > Backport the ath79 GPIO driver to kernel 4.4. > > Benefits this driver has compared with the old one: > - support for the interrupt controller > - module removable > > The new code using the generic MMIO GPIO driver starts in > kernel 4.6

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ar71xx: support for Zyxel NWA1121-NI (updated)

On 01/02/2017 09:51, alexpro wrote: > Hi, > > This is updated patch for Zyxel NWA1121-NI support: > > - added files, forgotten last time > - cleaned up the patch > - updated ar71xx.sh, platform.sh > - checked sysupgrade - works > > > > From d7372b409d6c69781f147949a511e61f539dbf2f Mon Sep 17

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: Support for TP-LINK MR6400

On 04/02/2017 14:54, Filip Moc wrote: > From 2a930f515c38069c2e57ef76f0ffe0d8e2ab115a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Filip Moc > Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 14:37:08 +0100 > Subject: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: Support for TP-LINK MR6400 > > Add support for TP-Link MR6400 > > Everything seems to be

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] procd: stop service using SIGKILL if SIGTERM failed to do so

Hi, i know that someone else is about to send a fix for the same issue but with a different approach of fixing it. i'd like to wait for this 2nd patch to arrive before we decide which to merge John On 09/02/2017 11:02, Alin Nastac wrote: > SIGKILL is sent if instance process is still run

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] procd: stop service using SIGKILL if SIGTERM failed to do so

On 09/02/2017 12:43, Alin Năstac wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i know that someone else is about to send a fix for the same issue but >> with a different approach of fixing it. i'd like to wait for this 2nd >>

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns] Send A(AAA) records when announcing

On 09/02/2017 10:11, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > This allows device to be discovered by its local hostname. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki Acked-by: John Crispin > --- > announce.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff -

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] ramips: add support for RATOC REX-WIFISD2

On 28/01/2017 17:03, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote: > RATOC REX-WIFISD2 is a battery-powered wireless SD card reader with > > - MT7620A + MT7610E > - 64MiB DDR2 SDRAM > - 16MiB SPI flash > - 2T2R 11b/g/n + 1T1R 11ac/a/n Wi-Fi > - 1x 10/100Mbps ethernet switch > - 1x SD card > - 1x USB 2.0 > - 2x p

Re: [LEDE-DEV] License for DTS files

On 09/02/2017 18:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 3 February 2017 at 12:29, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> In LEDE we have quite a lot of DTS files that hasn't been upstreamed. >> They often contain no licensing info. >> >> Upstream Linux maintainers prefer/require clear BSD-compatible >> license, see e.g

Re: [LEDE-DEV] FS#490 - BT Home Hub 5 Ethernet WAN Port configuration

On 10/02/2017 14:01, Mauro M. wrote: > In response to Mathias: > > > Let's have a look at the use cases for the Red Ethernet Port: > > 1) Classic case: Internet Home user with xDSL WAN + Wired and Wireless > Devices > > SCENARIO: In this case my WAN is the xDSL port, my router has 4 Ethernet

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns] Avoid duplicated iteration over services when announcing

ed in sending n^2 records. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki Acked-by: John Crispin > --- > service.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/service.c b/service.c > index 182b2b2..bb87aff 100644 > --- a/service.c > +++ b/servic

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns] Check correct attributes when loading service from blob

On 10/02/2017 14:48, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > We access SERVICE_TXT so we should check for this entry. Checking > SERVICE_SERVICE doesn't make sense anyway as it's verified few lines > above (in the same funcion). > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [LEDE-DEV] FS#490 - BT Home Hub 5 Ethernet WAN Port configuration

erwritten if not saved (/etc/board.json) and using a > counter-intuitive, not listed (in luci) device name that confuses end > users. > (2) to date my attempts to bridge the interface to another interface > (LAN) have failed as reported in FS#390. > > On 10/02/17 13:57, John Crispin

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns 1/2] Don't use _services._dns-sd._tcp.local

the first one should be used > and response PTR records should include services of both protocols: UDP > and TCP. > > This fixes discovering TCP services as in practice no other software was > sending queries with _services._dns-sd._tcp.local. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłe

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns 2/2] Drop one-liner service_announce function

On 10/02/2017 23:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > Now we have service_announce simplified so much there is no reason to > keep it as a helper. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki Acked-by: John Crispin > --- > announce.c | 2 +- > interface.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns] Rename project to umdns

o. > > Rename this project to umdns which follows other projects naming schema > and is unique enough. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki Acked-by: John Crispin > --- > CMakeLists.txt | 8 > ubus.c | 44 ++---

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Makefile question

On 11/02/2017 06:33, David Lang wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Philip Prindeville wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I was wondering if there’s an obvious place to install a hook that’s: >> >> (a) after all the packages have been installed; >> (b) before the root filesystem image gets finalized; >> >> I’d lik

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2 1/2] ar71xx: Add support for TP-Link MR6400

Hi, comments inline On 10/02/2017 21:28, Filip Moc wrote: > You can flash via u-boot tftp (serve factory image as /mr6400_tp_recovery.bin > on 192.168.0.66/24, connect to any ethernet port and power on device while > holding the reset button). > > v1->v2: > - Fixed DEVICE_TITLE > - Defined fla

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns] Load service JSONs from /etc/umdns/

On 11/02/2017 12:00, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > It matches recent project rename & uses directory that sholud be > persistent. Using /tmp/ could result in user having to setup JSONs after > every reboot. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns] Set TTL to the new value when updating cached service entry

re is a wildcard ... Acked-by: John Crispin feel free to automatically add this to your mdns patches after a grace period of 24 hours. i will continue to review the patches and if i see anything will opt-out. John > --- > cache.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mdns 1/3] Prepare support for sending unicast DNS answers

On 14/02/2017 13:48, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 14 February 2017 at 12:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> From: Rafał Miłecki >> >> This adds extra argument to dns_send_answer & interface_send_packet >> functions. For now we pass NULL-s only. > > Hi Rafał, please modify also dns_reply_a to accept this

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: set status led for the gl-* boards

On 14/02/2017 15:46, Wojciech Jowsa wrote: > This sets status_led for the gl-ar300m and gl-mifi boards. > > Signed-off-by: Wojciech Jowsa > --- > target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh | 4 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] utils/busybox: prevent weak root passwords

On 17/02/2017 12:16, Dan Lüdtke wrote: > Hi David, > > thanks for the fast response! > >> On 17 Feb 2017, at 11:54, David Lang wrote: >> But deciding that you know better than the admin of the system is not. > > Not that I am a fan of telling admins what to do, but do you see any chance > th

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] utils/busybox: prevent weak root passwords

On 17/02/2017 12:35, Alberto Bursi wrote: > > > On 02/17/2017 12:26 PM, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 17/02/2017 12:16, Dan Lüdtke wrote: >>> Hi David, >>> >>> thanks for the fast response! >>> >>>> On 17 Feb 2017, a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] QCA Dakota support

On 17/02/2017 15:46, Christian Lamparter wrote: > On Monday, October 31, 2016 10:38:18 PM CET Christian Mehlis wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is there someone working on QCA Dakota support for lede? > Heads-up! > >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] QCA Dakota support

On 17/02/2017 17:06, Matthew McClintock wrote: > Cool, still personally missing a Dakota board myself. Maybe I'll get one soon. > > -M > i used your v4.7-rc for-next tree as basis for the 4.9 support ;) John ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-d

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Add firmware for usb-serial-ti-usb

On 16/02/2017 11:18, David Woodhouse wrote: > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse > --- > package/firmware/linux-firmware/ti.mk | 13 + > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/package/firmware/linux-firmware/ti.mk > b/package/firmware/linux-firmware/ti.mk > index a1e12fc..ba

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] packages/utils/cryptodev-linux: Update to current master

On 15/02/2017 14:19, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > From: Alexey Brodkin > > This allows us to build kernel's crypto modules in Linux v4.9. > Otherwise we're seeing the following breakage: > --->8- > ...//openwrt/build_dir/target-arc_arc700_uClibc/linux-arc770_generic/c

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Add ip_vs kernel netfilter modules to enable load balancing capabilities

Hi, comments inline On 19/02/2017 13:01, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote: > Author: Mauro Mozzarelli > Date: Sun Feb 19 11:33:23 2017 + > > IPVS (IP Virtual Server) implements transport-layer load balancing ^ stray tab > inside the Linux kernel, so called Layer-4 switching. IPVS running on a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: fix vlan settings for some boards

On 20/02/2017 19:31, Piotr Dymacz wrote: > Hello, > > 2017-02-20 13:11 GMT+01:00 Conor O'Gorman : >> On 18/02/17 14:32, Weijie Gao wrote: >>> >>> For AR71XX devices, GMAC1 always connects port 0 of the built-in switch, >>> as the CPU port. >>> >>> This patch sets correct vlan for some devices wi

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] [17.01] Kernel: bump to 4.4.51

please also prepare a separate patch for trunk, so we canmerge both, even if they are different patches John On 24/02/2017 08:27, Stijn Segers wrote: > Hi Rafal, > > I talked this through with jow, a lot of targets have already dropped > 4.4 support in trunk, which makes backporting 4.4

Re: [LEDE-DEV] multi-function buttons

On 23/02/2017 12:39, Piotr Dymacz wrote: > Hello, > > 2017-02-20 9:11 GMT+01:00 Mathias Kresin : >> 19.02.2017 14:31, Piotr Dymacz: >> > This is more like offtopic, but there is another one problem with >> > similar devices. Lets forget now about "Wi-Fi enabled or not enabled >> > by default"

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] procd: service gets deleted when its last instance is freed

On 24/02/2017 10:26, Alin Nastac wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alin Nastac Hi, can you write a little more info as to why this is needed and what scenario this fixes/changes ? John > --- > service/service.c | 5 - > service/service.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deleti

[LEDE-DEV] [RFC] au1000: drop support

propose dropping the support unless anyone wants to start maintaining it. Signed-off-by: John Crispin --- package/boot/yamonenv/Makefile | 42 -- .../patches/001-yamonenv_mtd_partition.patch | 11 -- target/linux/au1000/Makefile | 32

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] procd.sh: use parrameterized respawn values

On 20/02/2017 13:05, Claudiu Brasovean wrote: Hi Claudiu, please add a description to the patch explaining what it does and why it is needed. John > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Brasovean > --- > package/system/procd/files/procd.sh | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] procd: service gets deleted when its last instance is freed

On 24/02/2017 11:21, Alin Năstac wrote: > Hi John, > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:53 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> can you write a little more info as to why this is needed and what >> scenario this fixes/changes ? > > 1) root@OpenWrt:~# uci show system.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC] au1000: drop support

On 26/02/2017 16:23, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > * John Crispin [26.02.2017 16:18]: >> This target failed to boot with v4.4 and we did not have the hardware to >> test. Bruno and myself were the last users and neither of us has any future > > I have 50 of them and will t

[LEDE-DEV] replacing mountd with blockd - looking for testers

Hi, i have created a branch in my staging tree [1] that removes mountd in favour of blockd. blockd is part of the fstools package and uses the block tool and /etc/config/fstab as a backend. blockd is an optional daemon and when installed will provide these features in addition to what block-mount

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Add ip_vs kernel netfilter modules to enable load balancing, capabilities

On 24/02/2017 12:42, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote: > IPVS (IP Virtual Server) implements transport-layer load balancing > inside the Linux kernel, so called Layer-4 switching. IPVS running on a > host acts as a load balancer at the front of a cluster of real servers, > it can direct requests for TCP/UD

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: set status led for the gl-* boards

On 15/02/2017 16:33, Wojciech Jowsa wrote: > This sets status_led for the gl-ar300m and gl-mifi boards, and fixes led > names > so that they follow correct naming scheme. > > > Signed-off-by: Wojciech Jowsa Hi, thanks for changing the leds globally, however when you sent this patch it got

Re: [LEDE-DEV] replacing mountd with blockd - looking for testers

On 27/02/2017 11:43, Alberto Bursi wrote: > > > On 02/27/2017 11:20 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> * support for eject buttons and LEDs > > Can this daemon light up a led every time a specific mounted partition > is accessed (read/written)? not y

Re: [LEDE-DEV] replacing mountd with blockd - looking for testers

On 27/02/2017 11:36, Daniel Golle wrote: > Hi John, > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:20:40AM +0100, John Crispin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i have created a branch in my staging tree [1] that removes mountd in >> favour of blockd. blockd is part of the fstools package an

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Adding new people in patchwork?

On 27/02/2017 23:59, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 01/15/2017 09:58 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> >> >> On 01/15/2017 05:45 AM, John Crispin wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 15/01/2017 05:22, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>>

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Add ip_vs kernel netfilter modules to enable load balancing, capabilities

On 28/02/2017 12:52, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote: > Then I take the output from git format-patch and I post it to the > mailing list. How exactly did you do this ? i assume using copy&paste into your mail client ? try using "git send-email" ___ Lede-dev ma

[LEDE-DEV] ath79 - pending tasks

Hi Antony, Hi Alban, I have been working on the ath79 OF target the last days. I created a new target within LEDE that uses pure devicetree support with the hope of obsoleting all our mach files and simplifying the code. The tl-wr-1043nd-v1 now boots fine and I just started adding OF support to th

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ath79 - pending tasks

Hi Alban, thanks for the reply > Having the ethernet working would be nice. Do you just target LEDE or > are you trying to get it in a state that would be acceptable for > mainline? first of i want to make it work inside LEDE but i do want to reduce our technical debt this year so its a realist

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ath79 - pending tasks

On 01/03/2017 18:03, Alban wrote: > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:44:30 +0100 > John Crispin wrote: > >> could you give a more detailed list of what clk and irq drivers are >> missing ? i could help write the code, i am just scared to duplicate >> some of your work. >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ugps: fix and improve init script

onfiguration. > > Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz Acked-by: John Crispin > --- > package/utils/ugps/Makefile| 2 +- > package/utils/ugps/files/ugps.init | 8 ++-- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/package/utils/ugps/Makefile b/pac

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: set status led for the gl-* boards

On 28/02/2017 14:18, Wojciech Jowsa wrote: > This sets status_led for the gl-ar300m and gl-mifi boards, and fixes led > names > so that they follow correct naming scheme. > It also fixes mangled whitespace in the mach-gl-ar300m.c. > > Signed-off-by: Wojciech Jowsa Applying: ar71xx: set statu

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH mountd 0/5] mounted: warnings fixes and refactoring

On 06/03/2017 07:11, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 03/05/2017 04:50 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This patch series fixed "unused results" warnings, and in the process >> refactors how properties from block devices are obtained from sysfs. > > So this was marked "Not applicab

Re: [LEDE-DEV] QCA Dakota support

Hi Matthew, can you point me at the tree to use on codeaurora ? i am also looking for the AP145 dts file. this is ipq8062 based John On 08/03/17 15:49, Matthew McClintock wrote: Most of the support for the SoC should be in place, the various Dakota boards dk0{1,4,7}-c{1,2,3,4} are very

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] [ubox] syslog: remove unnecessary sizeof struct between messages

On 10/03/17 11:06, Dan Bugnar wrote: The next message needs to be written after the data of current message. This was adding "sizeof(struct log_head)" bytes between messages. Signed-off-by: Dan Bugnar --- log/syslog.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/log/

reboot

the reboot was not meant to be hostile or disruptive to OpenWrt. we are just code nerds and messed up the politics of the launch at some places, which in itself shows one of the reasons that motivated the reboot. the whole idea is to give up our control over parts of the politics and attract a new

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] iftop: Update to latest version, and drop patch

On 05/05/2016 15:16, Bert Vermeulen wrote: > The patch made sure the ncursesw library was not selected to save space, > but that library doesn't exist in this distribution at all. are you sure that ncursesw is not inside any of the feeds either ? John > > Signed-off-by: Bert Vermeulen

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: Fix eth0 support for Ubiquiti UniFi AP AC

Hi, this is already in our staging tree. i cherry picked it fromt he owrt git tree last week John On 07/05/2016 12:35, p.wa...@gmx.at wrote: > From: Paul Wassi > > Fix eth0 support for the Ubiquiti UniFi AP AC > Signed-off-by: Paul Wassi > --- > In openwrt r48937 a patch was introduce

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

On 06/05/2016 02:16, l...@daniel.thecshore.com wrote: > package/base-files/files/etc/openwrt_release | 7 -- > package/base-files/files/etc/openwrt_version | 1 - these 2 files cannot simply be removed as that would break luci. we need to either create symlinks or teach luci to

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

On 08/05/2016 07:07, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > On 16-05-08 12:35 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 06/05/2016 02:16, l...@daniel.thecshore.com wrote: >>> package/base-files/files/etc/openwrt_release | 7 -- >>> package/base-files/files/etc/openw

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

On 08/05/2016 07:19, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > Also, as I mentioned in the preface (not sure if you saw), this patch > was intended to point things out for whoever does the actual patch > rather than as the patch that goes in. > > Feel free to make any changes you feel necessary. > > Regards, >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ramips: Add support for SamKnows Whitebox 8

Hi, as the files are already on github, fancy sending them as a PR via github ? John On 09/05/2016 07:18, Andrew Yong wrote: > The following changes since commit 91f205acaf2a44ae75418d2f2cb156149f0df8ae: > > kernel: add workaround to rebuild vdso-o32.so.dbg (2016-05-09 02:31:04 > +02

Re: [LEDE-DEV] OpenWRT tree vs LEDE tree

On 09/05/2016 09:44, David Lang wrote: > On Mon, 9 May 2016, Hans Dedecker wrote: > >> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >>> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> several people expressed the intention to continue pushing patches to >>> both trees. In any case we'll keep picking stuff fr

Re: [LEDE-DEV] LEDE TODO: Convert ar71xx to devicetree

On 10/05/2016 11:39, Antony Pavlov wrote: > Hi All! > > I have just seen https://www.lede-project.org/todo.html > > There is the "Convert ar71xx to devicetree" entry. > > I'm working on this topic. You can see my patchseries > in the mips-linux mailing list: > > https://www.linux-mips.org/a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] iperf unmaintained

On 10/05/2016 15:35, Bert Vermeulen wrote: > Hi all, > > The iperf package appears to be unmaintained, the maintainers directing > people to iperf3 instead (see https://sourceforge.net/projects/iperf/). > > There is a fork of the original iperf package that's seeing some > maintenance, named ip

Re: [LEDE-DEV] iperf unmaintained

On 10/05/2016 15:57, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2016-05-10 15:38, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 10/05/2016 15:35, Bert Vermeulen wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The iperf package appears to be unmaintained, the maintainers directing >>> peopl

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >