On 09/05/2016 09:44, David Lang wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2016, Hans Dedecker wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich <j...@mein.io> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> several people expressed the intention to continue pushing patches to
>>> both trees. In any case we'll keep picking stuff from both lists for
>>> LEDE for some time to come.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jo-Philipp
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>
>> Hi Jo-Philipp,
>>
>> Can the patches applied by the LEDE developers both on the LEDE and
>> OpenWRT trees be kept in sync during a transition period on both trees
>> ? I delivered a number of patches 10 days ago; I notice some of them
>> are only applied on the LEDE tree and vice versa (others still
>> untouched in patchwork). Keeping patches in sync will make the
>> transition period more smoothly and reduce the overhead for people
>> like me and others to figure out what patch is present on which tree.
>
> I don't think that will be possible because it's different people
> working on each tree. I know the OpenWRT folks deleted the @openwrt
> e-mail addresses for the people working on LEDE. I would assume that
> they have blocked commit access for those people ase well, but I don't
> know for sure.
>
> David Lang
>
we are working on a solution to resolve this in the best possible manner
for everyone involved. please be patient for a few more days.
John
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
