I think, most simple would be to detect a link up/down with Hotplug
and then run ifup/down on ethernet so route is automatically removed.
I tried to add my hotplug script:
root@:/# cat /etc/hotplug.d/iface/40-eth
# enable access from client network
#[ "$INTERFACE" = lan ] || exit 0
#[ "$ACTION" =
If the network interface goes through the switch in the AP, then you will not
see the interface on the CPU go up/down. At best you could poll the switch info
(if it gives you link state)
David Lang
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
Ok thanks Tobias.
How can I detect that ethernet i
#x27;t know if e.g. mwan3 package can do that.
>
>
> ---- Original Message
> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Routing two interfaces on same subnet
> From: Baptiste Clenet
> To: Tobias Welz
> Cc: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
> Date: 6.7.2016 11:19:44
>>
>>
if e.g. mwan3 package can do that.
Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Routing two interfaces on same subnet
From: Baptiste Clenet
To: Tobias Welz
Cc: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Date: 6.7.2016 11:19:44
Thing is I don't want to relay traffic from ethernet to wifi S
If both are in the same network it should be fine. If both are in
different networks, then you cause trouble.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Routing two interfaces on same subnet
From: Baptiste Clenet
To: Tobias Welz
Cc: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Date: 6.7.2016
t;>>>
>>>> I think we need to know more about your setup, and what you want to
>>>> achieve.
>>>> Let's say we have LAN and WAN interfaces as ethernet ports, and also
>>>> WIFI.
>>>>
>>>> Should the WIFI be in AP
ore about your setup, and what you want to
>>> achieve.
>>> Let's say we have LAN and WAN interfaces as ethernet ports, and also
>>> WIFI.
>>>
>>> Should the WIFI be in AP or in STA mode?
>>> Shall wifi be bridged to LAN or to the WAN interf
Should the WIFI be in AP or in STA mode?
Shall wifi be bridged to LAN or to the WAN interface?
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Routing two interfaces on same subnet
From: Baptiste Clenet
To: Tobias Welz
Cc: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Date: 5.7.2016 19:33:02
W
gt; Let's say we have LAN and WAN interfaces as ethernet ports, and also WIFI.
>
> Should the WIFI be in AP or in STA mode?
> Shall wifi be bridged to LAN or to the WAN interface?
>
>
> -------- Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Routing two interfac
- Original Message
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Routing two interfaces on same subnet
From: Baptiste Clenet
To: Tobias Welz
Cc: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Date: 5.7.2016 19:15:42
Hi Tobias,
I see, I tried to bridge them, but I got a problem, I'll try again.
Isn't it a problem if
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
> Wifi and ethernet are in client mode.
> pseudo bridge with relayd? Can you describe a bit?
Here is how I do it on a Nanostation M2Loco:
#/etc/config/network
config interface 'lan'
option type 'bridge'
option stp '1'
o
st bridge LAN and WIFI together, which is
> the default anyway. A factory default will bring you to this setting, turn
> on wifi and you are done.
> Regards Tobias
>
> Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Routing two interfaces on same subnet
> From: Baptiste
gards Tobias
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Routing two interfaces on same subnet
From: Baptiste Clenet
To: Tobias Welz
Cc: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Date: 5.7.2016 19:15:42
Hi Tobias,
I see, I tried to bridge them, but I got a problem, I'll try again.
Isn't
Hi Tobias,
I see, I tried to bridge them, but I got a problem, I'll try again.
Isn't it a problem if both interfaces are connected to same network in a bridge?
2016-07-05 19:04 GMT+02:00 Tobias Welz :
> Hello,
> for me it looks a bit strange, why not put both interfaces together on Layer
> 2 - so
Hello,
for me it looks a bit strange, why not put both interfaces together on
Layer 2 - so bridge them together - which is the default anyway? It
looks very strange to me, to split that stuff on layer 3 with the same
subnet, which now need a lot of hacking to bring it to work again, which
i pe
Hi Baptiste,
I didn't see your mail, it was on SPAM, don't know why.
My use case:
I won't be able to control the router and people who will use it
should be able to connect either by ethernet or by wifi to another
product.
So one solution could be to allow only one interface at a time.
How can I d
On 07/05/2016 08:13 AM, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
Thanks Ben for your answer.
How to use arp-flter?
Could you suggest a configuration which solve the problem?
I don't have time to dig into your specific issue, but google for arp_filter
and you should find some useful information.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Thanks Ben for your answer.
How to use arp-flter?
Could you suggest a configuration which solve the problem?
Cheers,
2016-07-05 0:57 GMT+02:00 Ben Greear :
> On 07/04/2016 02:53 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:54:27PM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Wang,
>>>
On 07/04/2016 02:53 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:54:27PM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
Hi Wang,
Thank for your answer. May you explain how to do that?
I think this should work.
The general idea would be:
default via 192.168.0.1 dev wlan0 src 192.168.0.12 metric
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:54:27PM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
> Hi Wang,
> Thank for your answer. May you explain how to do that?
> I think this should work.
The general idea would be:
default via 192.168.0.1 dev wlan0 src 192.168.0.12 metric 300
default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 src 19
Hi Wang,
Thank for your answer. May you explain how to do that?
I think this should work.
2016-07-04 12:16 GMT+02:00 Wang Linetkux :
> Hi,
> I think you can setup two default route with different/proper metric
> value. Which means you use one of them as the backup line, and the
> other as the ma
Hi,
I think you can setup two default route with different/proper metric
value. Which means you use one of them as the backup line, and the
other as the main line.
Thanks,
Rujun
2016-07-04 16:14 GMT+08:00 Baptiste Clenet :
> Hi,
>
> On my board, I've got a wifi and an ethernet interfaces on t
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:14:26AM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On my board, I've got a wifi and an ethernet interfaces on the same
> subnet (192.168.0.0/24). Problem is if ethernet cable is unplugged I
> can't use wifi anymore, see
>
> root@eisox:/# ip route
> default via 192.168.0.50
23 matches
Mail list logo
