Thanks Ben for your answer. How to use arp-flter? Could you suggest a configuration which solve the problem?
Cheers, 2016-07-05 0:57 GMT+02:00 Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>: > On 07/04/2016 02:53 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:54:27PM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote: >>> >>> Hi Wang, >>> Thank for your answer. May you explain how to do that? >>> I think this should work. >> >> >> The general idea would be: >> >> default via 192.168.0.1 dev wlan0 src 192.168.0.12 metric 300 >> default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 src 192.168.1.42 metric 200 >> >> where the route with the lowest metric is used. If it disappears, the >> remaining route is used instead. >> >> You should be able to do that on LEDE/OpenWRT, see the metric option here: >> >> https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network#ipv4_routes >> >> The problem is that, in your case, it probably won't work, because: >> >> 1) you mentioned that the route doesn't go away when the interface goes >> down (which might or might not be a bug) >> >> 2) if both gateways are in the same subnet, chances are you're screwed up >> anyway, because the kernel will only do ARP on one of your interface, >> for both routes. I'd be interested to know if this is not the case. > > > arp-filter can fix #2. > > Thanks, > Ben > > -- > Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > -- Baptiste _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
