Thing is I don't want to relay traffic from ethernet to wifi STA, I want that if ethernet is connected, wifi is disabled and if ethernet is unplugged, wifi is enabled.
2016-07-06 9:05 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Clenet <bapcle...@gmail.com>: > Ok Thanks Tobias, > I will try to implement it. > So if user plugged ethernet to the internet provider router and wifi > is also connected, they will be no problem? > > 2016-07-06 2:16 GMT+02:00 Tobias Welz <t...@wiznet.eu>: >> Bridging in client mode is not supported by most devices. >> That's why you need a "pseudo bridge" with relayd here: >> https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/recipes/relayclient >> >> >> On 05.07.2016 23:14, Baptiste Clenet wrote: >>> >>> Ok. >>> I've got a router with one ethernet port and wifi in STA mode. The >>> user which is going to use the router will be able to connect this >>> router to internet router either by ethernet or wifi. >>> So if he plugs ethernet and decide to connect his router by wifi also, >>> ethernet and wifi will be on same network (same subnet). >>> Is it clearer? >>> Currently, when I start my board, I've got this config even if >>> ethernet is unplugged (wifi STA connects automatically): >>> root@eisox:/# ip route >>> default via 192.168.0.50 dev eth0 proto static >>> 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.85 >>> 192.168.0.0/24 dev apcli0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.80 >>> >>> Then I can't ping my router because of the route on eth0 >>> May I use a bridge in this set up? >>> >>> >>> 2016-07-05 20:26 GMT+02:00 Tobias Welz <t...@wiznet.eu>: >>>> >>>> I think we need to know more about your setup, and what you want to >>>> achieve. >>>> Let's say we have LAN and WAN interfaces as ethernet ports, and also >>>> WIFI. >>>> >>>> Should the WIFI be in AP or in STA mode? >>>> Shall wifi be bridged to LAN or to the WAN interface? >>>> >>>> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Routing two interfaces on same subnet >>>> From: Baptiste Clenet <bapcle...@gmail.com> >>>> To: Tobias Welz <t...@wiznet.eu> >>>> Cc: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >>>> Date: 5.7.2016 19:33:02 >>>>> >>>>> Wifi and ethernet are in client mode. >>>>> pseudo bridge with relayd? Can you describe a bit? >>>>> >>>>> 2016-07-05 19:24 GMT+02:00 Tobias Welz <t...@wiznet.eu>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> it's just a little problem if you are in in client mode, then you need >>>>>> a >>>>>> pseudo bridge with relayd. >>>>>> If you use AP mode then you can just bridge LAN and WIFI together, >>>>>> which >>>>>> is >>>>>> the default anyway. A factory default will bring you to this setting, >>>>>> turn >>>>>> on wifi and you are done. >>>>>> Regards Tobias >>>>>> >>>>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>>>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Routing two interfaces on same subnet >>>>>> From: Baptiste Clenet <bapcle...@gmail.com> >>>>>> To: Tobias Welz <t...@wiznet.eu> >>>>>> Cc: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >>>>>> Date: 5.7.2016 19:15:42 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Tobias, >>>>>>> I see, I tried to bridge them, but I got a problem, I'll try again. >>>>>>> Isn't it a problem if both interfaces are connected to same network in >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> bridge? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2016-07-05 19:04 GMT+02:00 Tobias Welz <t...@wiznet.eu>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> for me it looks a bit strange, why not put both interfaces together >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>> Layer >>>>>>>> 2 - so bridge them together - which is the default anyway? It looks >>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>> strange to me, to split that stuff on layer 3 with the same subnet, >>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>> now need a lot of hacking to bring it to work again, which i >>>>>>>> personally >>>>>>>> would like to avoid in a production environment. >>>>>>>> For me it looks like a "wrong" approach - what is the special need to >>>>>>>> doing >>>>>>>> it in this way? >>>>>>>> What is the problem with using a bridge over these two interfaces >>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>> should just run out of the box? >>>>>>>> Regards Tobias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>>>>>> Subject: [LEDE-DEV] Routing two interfaces on same subnet >>>>>>>> From: Baptiste Clenet <bapcle...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >>>>>>>> Date: 4.7.2016 10:14:26 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On my board, I've got a wifi and an ethernet interfaces on the same >>>>>>>>> subnet (192.168.0.0/24). Problem is if ethernet cable is unplugged I >>>>>>>>> can't use wifi anymore, see >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> root@eisox:/# ip route >>>>>>>>> default via 192.168.0.50 dev eth0 proto static >>>>>>>>> 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.85 >>>>>>>>> 192.168.0.0/24 dev apcli0 proto kernel scope link src >>>>>>>>> 192.168.0.80 >>>>>>>>> Here, ethernet is unplugged and wifi connected to other router so I >>>>>>>>> can't use the wifi (ping failed in both direction). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If I delete eth route, it works. >>>>>>>>> root@eisox:/# ip route del 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 >>>>>>>>> root@eisox:/# ip route >>>>>>>>> default via 192.168.0.50 dev eth0 proto static >>>>>>>>> 192.168.0.0/24 dev apcli0 proto kernel scope link src >>>>>>>>> 192.168.0.80 >>>>>>>>> root@eisox:/# >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How can I can solve the problem? >>>>>>>>> I won't know the status of Wifi and Ethernet so I would like that >>>>>>>>> both >>>>>>>>> can work if they are plugged. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or how to disable one interface is the other one is connected (like >>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>> ethernet is plugged, allow only ethernet to work, if it is >>>>>>>>> unplugged, >>>>>>>>> allow only wifi) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lede-dev mailing list >> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev > > > > -- > Baptiste -- Baptiste _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
