On 03/31/2018 06:03 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Mar 31, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Eric Luehrsen wrote:
It seems I have static-stub wrong for its purpose. dhcpd and bind do work
together. To accomplish this, the bind instance needs to be master for the
domain zone and ptr zone where DHCP recor
> On Mar 31, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Eric Luehrsen wrote:
>
> It seems I have static-stub wrong for its purpose. dhcpd and bind do work
> together. To accomplish this, the bind instance needs to be master for the
> domain zone and ptr zone where DHCP records will be entered. This master zone
> ne
It seems I have static-stub wrong for its purpose. dhcpd and bind do
work together. To accomplish this, the bind instance needs to be master
for the domain zone and ptr zone where DHCP records will be entered.
This master zone needs to permit remote updates, preferably with a
secure key. dhcpd
> On Mar 31, 2018, at 9:03 AM, Eric Luehrsen wrote:
>
> On 03/25/2018 03:27 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Thinking Bind, probably.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 23, 2018, at 5:38 PM, Eric Luehrsen wrote:
>>>
>>> What do you want to serve your dns then? Unbound or Bind?
>>>
>>> - Eric
>>>
>>> On
On 03/25/2018 03:27 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Thinking Bind, probably.
On Mar 23, 2018, at 5:38 PM, Eric Luehrsen wrote:
What do you want to serve your dns then? Unbound or Bind?
- Eric
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 1:31 PM Philip Prindeville
wrote:
Hi all,
As the ISC-DHCP maintainer, I ne
Thinking Bind, probably.
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 5:38 PM, Eric Luehrsen wrote:
>
> What do you want to serve your dns then? Unbound or Bind?
>
> - Eric
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 1:31 PM Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As the ISC-DHCP maintainer, I need to eat my own dogfood so I r
