Thinking Bind, probably.
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 5:38 PM, Eric Luehrsen <ericluehr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What do you want to serve your dns then? Unbound or Bind? > > - Eric > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 1:31 PM Philip Prindeville > <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > As the ISC-DHCP maintainer, I need to eat my own dogfood so I run that here, > before anyone quips, “Why don’t you just run dnsmasq instead?” > > So… I have some internal names that I want to be able to resolve internally, > but I also need to provide DNS service for all of my DHCP clients. > > Is there a way to prime a “fake” local zone (or cache) and run a caching only > nameserver that’s been primed with this “split-horizon” info (i.e. the local > names for machines on 192.168.1.0/24, etc)? > > Or equally, have DHCP prime the local names into the DNS as they get > allocated (well, that wouldn’t fully solve my problem as my mail server has a > statically allocated IP address, so DHCP wouldn’t know about that). > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > -Philip _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
