> On Oct 3, 2017, at 3:27 AM, Stijn Tintel wrote:
>
> On 03-10-17 03:31, David Lang wrote:
>> note that the kernel currently under development (4.14) is tagged to
>> be a LTS kernel (6 years of support), so it would be good to work on
>> that if possible.
> I would prefer to have a release based
Hi all -
I have pushed an update to kernel 4.9 for ixp4xx to my staging repo at:
https://git.lede-project.org/lede/thess/staging.git ixp4xx-kernel-4.9
I have only tested it on an Actiontec MI424WR and an NSLU2.
Any feedback appreciated. I will merge it soon if no problems arise.
/ted
___
Hi Hauke,
On 10/22/2017 08:15 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 10/02/2017 09:18 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> For the next major LEDE release after 17.01 all targets should be on
>> kernel 4.9, otherwise they will most likely not be included in the release.
>>
>> The following targets are on kernel 4
On 10/02/2017 09:18 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> For the next major LEDE release after 17.01 all targets should be on
> kernel 4.9, otherwise they will most likely not be included in the release.
>
> The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
> * apm821xx
> * arc770
> * archs38
> * armvi
On 02.10.2017 22:18, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
For the next major LEDE release after 17.01 all targets should be on
kernel 4.9, otherwise they will most likely not be included in the release.
The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
* apm821xx
* arc770
* archs38
* armvirt
* ath25
* bcm5
On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 13:24 +0300, Andrey Jr. Melnikov wrote:
> Rebase from 4.4 to 4.9 or 4.14 is same - for example ar71xx need write for
> ALL targets dts configs.
Er, what?
If your rebase to 4.14 for anything but an ultra-new platform which is
still in the initial throes of development is an
Stijn Tintel wrote:
> On 03-10-17 03:31, David Lang wrote:
> > note that the kernel currently under development (4.14) is tagged to
> > be a LTS kernel (6 years of support), so it would be good to work on
> > that if possible.
> I would prefer to have a release based on 4.9 first. Many targets hav
On 03-10-17 03:31, David Lang wrote:
> note that the kernel currently under development (4.14) is tagged to
> be a LTS kernel (6 years of support), so it would be good to work on
> that if possible.
I would prefer to have a release based on 4.9 first. Many targets have
already received extensive te
Linux 4.9 is used in Debian stretch. This version will probably be supported
for the next 3 years. Maybe even 4 or 5 years.
David Lang wrote:
>note that the kernel currently under development (4.14) is tagged to be
>a LTS
>kernel (6 years of support), so it would be good to work on that if
>po
note that the kernel currently under development (4.14) is tagged to be a LTS
kernel (6 years of support), so it would be good to work on that if possible.
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listin
On 10/02/2017 12:57 PM, Ted Hess wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Hauke Mehrtens Sent: Monday, October
>> 02, 2017 3:18 PM To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org Subject: [LEDE-DEV]
>> kernel 4.9 migration for next release
>> For the next major LEDE release after 17.01
-Original Message-
From: Hauke Mehrtens
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 3:18 PM
To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [LEDE-DEV] kernel 4.9 migration for next release
For the next major LEDE release after 17.01 all targets should be on
kernel 4.9, otherwise they will most likely
For the next major LEDE release after 17.01 all targets should be on
kernel 4.9, otherwise they will most likely not be included in the release.
The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
* apm821xx
* arc770
* archs38
* armvirt
* ath25
* bcm53xx
* brcm2708
* cns3xxx
* imx6
* ipq806x
* k
13 matches
Mail list logo
