Stijn Tintel <st...@linux-ipv6.be> wrote: > On 03-10-17 03:31, David Lang wrote: > > note that the kernel currently under development (4.14) is tagged to > > be a LTS kernel (6 years of support), so it would be good to work on > > that if possible. > I would prefer to have a release based on 4.9 first. Many targets have > already received extensive testing with 4.9 by users running master. > Targetting a new kernel will delay a new major release too long to my > liking.
Rebase from 4.4 to 4.9 or 4.14 is same - for example ar71xx need write for ALL targets dts configs. Sitting at 4.9 kernel (now six year LTS) is good, but who will be backports fixes from newer kernels? _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
