Yes, confirmed.
I updated to:
5c983be uclient: update to 2017-09-06
and then rebased, deleting out the 3 last util-linux commits:
e505f59 utils/util-linux: Update to 2.30.1
4fce22e util-linux: add missing dependencies
5c2c0f8 util-linux: don't need to build NLS support
and built and installed
The culprit is
e505f59 utils/util-linux: Update to 2.30.1
On 6 September 2017 at 12:24, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
>
> Thanks.
>
> It’s not 100% reproducible which makes it time-consuming to bisect because
> you have to repeat steps a few times.
>
> But I did conclude decisively that it did NOT p
On 31 August 2017 at 04:11, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
> Looking a little further into the console logging, what I’m seeing after a
> “dd” directly onto the flash is this:
>
> Press the [f] key and hit [enter] to enter failsafe mode
> Press the [1], [2], [3] or [4] key and hit [enter] to select th
> On Sep 5, 2017, at 8:50 PM, Ryan Mounce wrote:
>
> On 31 August 2017 at 04:11, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>> Looking a little further into the console logging, what I’m seeing after a
>> “dd” directly onto the flash is this:
>>
>> Press the [f] key and hit [enter] to enter failsafe mode
>>
Looking a little further into the console logging, what I’m seeing after a “dd”
directly onto the flash is this:
Press the [f] key and hit [enter] to enter failsafe mode
Press the [1], [2], [3] or [4] key and hit [enter] to select the debug level
[6.299598] mount_root: loading kmods from inte
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:16 AM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 29, 2017, at 1:19 AM, Stijn Tintel wrote:
>>
>>> On 29-08-17 09:09, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I don’t know if sysupgrade is the problem, or if this is where things
>>> manifest.
>>>
>>> But I recentl
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 1:19 AM, Stijn Tintel wrote:
>
>> On 29-08-17 09:09, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I don’t know if sysupgrade is the problem, or if this is where things
>> manifest.
>>
>> But I recently (within the last week, but I only rebase once or twice a
>> week) start
On 29-08-17 09:09, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I don’t know if sysupgrade is the problem, or if this is where things
> manifest.
>
> But I recently (within the last week, but I only rebase once or twice a week)
> started seeing issues with doing sysupgrade on x86_64 hardware.
>
> The
Hi all,
I don’t know if sysupgrade is the problem, or if this is where things manifest.
But I recently (within the last week, but I only rebase once or twice a week)
started seeing issues with doing sysupgrade on x86_64 hardware.
The sysupgrade will appear to go okay, but then when the machine
