On 09.02.2018 23:48, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 02/09/2018 12:27 AM, Lucian Cristian wrote:
On 21.01.2018 19:53, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
This add support for kernel 4.14 to the mvebu target. My main reason to
add kernel 4.14 support is to make it easier to also add support for the
Marvell Armada 37
On 02/09/2018 11:57 PM, Rosen Penev wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> On 01/21/2018 06:53 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>> This add support for kernel 4.14 to the mvebu target. My main reason to
>>> add kernel 4.14 support is to make it easier to also add support for t
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Rosen Penev wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> On 01/21/2018 06:53 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>> This add support for kernel 4.14 to the mvebu target. My main reason to
>>> add kernel 4.14 support is to make it easier to also add supp
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 01/21/2018 06:53 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> This add support for kernel 4.14 to the mvebu target. My main reason to
>> add kernel 4.14 support is to make it easier to also add support for the
>> Marvell Armada 3700LP ARM64 SoCs especiall
On 01/21/2018 06:53 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> This add support for kernel 4.14 to the mvebu target. My main reason to
> add kernel 4.14 support is to make it easier to also add support for the
> Marvell Armada 3700LP ARM64 SoCs especially the ESPRESSObin board.
>
> I do not have any of the cu
On 02/09/2018 12:27 AM, Lucian Cristian wrote:
> On 21.01.2018 19:53, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> This add support for kernel 4.14 to the mvebu target. My main reason to
>> add kernel 4.14 support is to make it easier to also add support for the
>> Marvell Armada 3700LP ARM64 SoCs especially the ESPRE
On 21.01.2018 19:53, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
This add support for kernel 4.14 to the mvebu target. My main reason to
add kernel 4.14 support is to make it easier to also add support for the
Marvell Armada 3700LP ARM64 SoCs especially the ESPRESSObin board.
I do not have any of the currently suppor
The interesting part is that for ipq806x there has been an extra definition
for Winbond W25N01GV where the pagesize has been finetuned:
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/ipq806x/patches-4.9/104-mtd-nand-add-Winbond-manufacturer-and-chip.patch;hb=HEAD
That has
Sorry, my fingers might have been quicker than my thoughts. Was the
first tthing I thought about, but haven't thoroughly checked the
WRT3200ACM issue.
Stijn
Op zo, 21 jan 2018 om 9:04 , schreef Stijn Segers
:
Hi Hannu,
See
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-January/010870.h
Hi Hannu,
See
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-January/010870.html
Apparently supported as from 4.11
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Hauke Mehrtens kirjoitti 21.1.2018 klo 19:53:
This add support for kernel 4.14 to the mvebu target. My main reason to
add kernel 4.14 support is to make it easier to also add support for the
Marvell Armada 3700LP ARM64 SoCs especially the ESPRESSObin board.
I wonder if 4.14 adds support for the
This add support for kernel 4.14 to the mvebu target. My main reason to
add kernel 4.14 support is to make it easier to also add support for the
Marvell Armada 3700LP ARM64 SoCs especially the ESPRESSObin board.
I do not have any of the currently supported boards so I can not runtime
test this
12 matches
Mail list logo
