On 2017-07-19 12:14, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
> On 2017-07-18 19:34, Drie, Herman van (zakelijk) wrote:
>> On 2017-07-18 18:29, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
>>> On 2017-05-29 11:24, Sven Roederer wrote:
This patch adds support for the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X-SFP and improves
support for the Edge
an" "0:wan" "6@eth0"
-Original Message-
From: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of
Torbjorn Jansson
Sent: dinsdag 18 juli 2017 18:29
To: Sven Roederer ; lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] ramips: add support for Ubiquiti
E
On Behalf Of
Torbjorn Jansson
Sent: dinsdag 18 juli 2017 18:29
To: Sven Roederer ; lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] ramips: add support for Ubiquiti
EdgeRouter X-SFP
On 2017-05-29 11:24, Sven Roederer wrote:
> This patch adds support for the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X-
On 2017-05-29 11:24, Sven Roederer wrote:
This patch adds support for the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X-SFP and
improves support for the EdgeRouter X (PoE-passthrough).
Specification:
- SoC: MediaTek MT7621AT
- Flash: 256 MiB
- RAM: 265 MiB
- Ethernet: 5 x LAN (1000 Mbps)
- UART: 1 x UART on PCB (3.3V,
> If you're crashing the box my guess would be there's a bug in the cake
> qdisc somewhere. What happens if you run SQM with fq_codel instead?
I switched over to fq_codel + simple.qos two days ago.
First, the 'frequently' appearing errors were gone - all seemed fine.
However, after ~30h and ~4GB o
To my limited knowlegde RCU is a notoriously difficult pattern to code right.
In order to avoid locking in concurrent processing context RCU uses primitives
like memory barriers which demands very strict and often subtle rules to be
followed. Implementations of memory barriers are very architect
On 12/06/17 21:00, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
p.wa...@gmx.at writes:
My SQM configuration was basically just using cake + piece_of_cake.qos,
but that's clearly off topic for now. (I'm also CC'ing this mail to Toke,
the maintainer of sqm-scripts).
If you're crashing the box my guess would
Isn't this related to FS#764 ?
> Op 12 jun. 2017, om 20:14 heeft p.wa...@gmx.at het volgende geschreven:
>
> Ok - I've got some interesting news.
> First, the stalls started to appear on multiple CPUs/tasks simultaneously:
> (find an excerpt from dmesg under [1]).
>
> For further testing, I've
p.wa...@gmx.at writes:
> Ok - I've got some interesting news.
> First, the stalls started to appear on multiple CPUs/tasks simultaneously:
> (find an excerpt from dmesg under [1]).
>
> For further testing, I've disabled SQM, rebooted and whoaa...
> These kernel errors are gone. Running fine since
Ok - I've got some interesting news.
First, the stalls started to appear on multiple CPUs/tasks simultaneously:
(find an excerpt from dmesg under [1]).
For further testing, I've disabled SQM, rebooted and whoaa...
These kernel errors are gone. Running fine since 13 hours.
So it seems that it's not
Hi,
it's the same there (4.9.31) - it happens every now and then (interval is a few
minutes).
> [ 260.58] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> [ 260.59]2-...: (0 ticks this GP) idle=50c/0/0 softirq=4340/4340
> fqs=0
> [ 260.60](detected by 1, t=6004 j
On 09/06/17 08:48, p.wa...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi guys,
I may be hijacking this specific thread, but as 'testing' was mentioned here...
I'm running an Edgerouter X since yesterday (not the -SPF version!) on LEDE
r4356
and am getting these kernel errors/warnings every five minutes or so:
Hi,
can
Hi guys,
I may be hijacking this specific thread, but as 'testing' was mentioned here...
I'm running an Edgerouter X since yesterday (not the -SPF version!) on LEDE
r4356
and am getting these kernel errors/warnings every five minutes or so:
> [ 470.41] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPU
On 07/06/17 01:36, Sven Roederer wrote:
John,
just checked with master build f500799 as initrd-kernel. Looks fine as
I can see from bootlog.
Anything special to test?
[1.71] MediaTek Nand driver init, version v2.1 Fix AHB virt2phys error
[1.72] Allocate 16 byte aligned buffer:
John,
just checked with master build f500799 as initrd-kernel. Looks fine as
I can see from bootlog.
Anything special to test?
[1.71] MediaTek Nand driver init, version v2.1 Fix AHB virt2phys error
[1.72] Allocate 16 byte aligned buffer: 80592f90
[1.73] Enable NFI Clock
[
On 2017-05-29 11:24, Sven Roederer wrote:
This patch adds support for the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X-SFP and
improves support for the EdgeRouter X (PoE-passthrough).
Specification:
- SoC: MediaTek MT7621AT
- Flash: 256 MiB
- RAM: 265 MiB
- Ethernet: 5 x LAN (1000 Mbps)
- UART: 1 x UART on PCB (3.3V,
its in my staging tree which i will push later today or tomorrow. i
pushed nand fixes for v4.9 end of last week, could you try the v4.9
kernel on your board please and let me know if it works ?
John
On 04/06/17 21:52, Sven Roederer wrote:
Hi,
I got a notification from patchwork, that thi
Hi,
I got a notification from patchwork, that this was accepted on 01.06.17, but I
still can't find it on master.
Can anyone explain?
Svne
On Montag, 29. Mai 2017 11:24:49 CEST Sven Roederer wrote:
> This patch adds support for the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X-SFP and
> improves support for the EdgeRo
This patch adds support for the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X-SFP and
improves support for the EdgeRouter X (PoE-passthrough).
Specification:
- SoC: MediaTek MT7621AT
- Flash: 256 MiB
- RAM: 265 MiB
- Ethernet: 5 x LAN (1000 Mbps)
- UART: 1 x UART on PCB (3.3V, RX, TX, GND) - 57600 8N1
- EdgeRouter X:
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
