Hi,
On 2017-05-22 03:10, John Crispin wrote:
On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote:
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst
most people said they did not
On Donnerstag, 11. Mai 2017 21:59:02 CEST Ram Chandra Jangir wrote:
> ++ mux {
> ++ pins = "gpio52", "gpio53", "gpio54",
> ++ "gpio55", "gpio56", "gpio57",
> ++
On 05/22/2017 02:02 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>> *) branding
>> - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
>> - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most
>> people said they did not care
>> - as the last vote had a
On Freitag, 21. April 2017 00:25:37 CEST Ram Chandra Jangir wrote:
> +@@ -419,18 +424,19 @@
> + status = "disabled";
> +
> + gmac0: gmac0 {
> + local-mac-address = [00 00 00 00 00 00];
> +- vlan_t
On 22 May 2017 at 19:52, Karl Palsson wrote:
>
> Yousong Zhou wrote:
>> On 19 May 2017 at 18:44, Karl Palsson
>> wrote:
>> > Resending to the list properly as planned...
>> >
>> >
>> > I've modified one of my packages (mosquitto) to use the
>> > autoassignment style, as it never cared about the
scripts/qemustart
using squashfs results in a "no space left on device" error. You need to
manually extend the new build with a tool like dd.
This patch adds the --extend-squasfs parameter to enlarge the image to
64MB. The (64MB - 20MB =) ~44MB free space will be used by the
overlayfs.
This appr
Hi, Paul
On 18 May 2017 at 03:40, Paul Spooren wrote:
> scripts/qemustart
>
> the function do_setup is never used except if the script is changed
> manually. It's used to easily setup bridges and traffic forwarding.
> Adding the parameter --do-config simplifies the deployment.
>
I thought about
Yousong Zhou wrote:
> On 19 May 2017 at 18:44, Karl Palsson
> wrote:
> > Resending to the list properly as planned...
> >
> >
> > I've modified one of my packages (mosquitto) to use the
> > autoassignment style, as it never cared about the actual uid/gid.
> >
> > However, is this really the expe
From: Rafał Miłecki
Don't include wpad-mini when it's useless just like we don't include
useless wireless drivers.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
target/linux/bcm53xx/Makefile | 2 +-
target/linux/bcm53xx/image/Makefile | 26 ++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+
On 19 May 2017 at 18:44, Karl Palsson wrote:
> Resending to the list properly as planned...
>
>
> I've modified one of my packages (mosquitto) to use the
> autoassignment style, as it never cared about the actual uid/gid.
>
> However, is this really the expected behaviour?
>
> # cat /etc/passwd
>
John Crispin writes:
> the lede rules that will become the new owrt rules.
You may want to mention this fact in the merge proposal itself. What
would happen to the rules was one of the points that was unclear in the
first round, I believe... :)
-Toke
___
On 22/05/17 11:39, Vincenzo Romano wrote:
I also agree to everything.
With am extra point.
2017-05-22 11:18 GMT+02:00 tapper :
*) SPI
- nominate a new liaison team (imre and john offer to do this, if anyone
else is interested let us know)
- inform SPI of the new liaisons, voters and project r
On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote:
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst
most people said they did not care
- as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a r
I also agree to everything.
With am extra point.
2017-05-22 11:18 GMT+02:00 tapper :
>> *) SPI
>> - nominate a new liaison team (imre and john offer to do this, if anyone
>> else is interested let us know)
>> - inform SPI of the new liaisons, voters and project rules
>> - this should be done early
Sounds good to me!
On 22/05/2017 08:40, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
John
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) major
On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote:
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people
said they did not care
- as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a remerge using the owrt brand is the
only fe
Hi,
here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
John
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most
people s
Hi Jo,
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> wouldn't it be simpler to introduce hashlimit support for ordinary rules
> instead?
>
> Is there a particular reason for a separate chain and a separate section
> type?
The goal is to protect against a denial of service. The device
Hi Alin,
wouldn't it be simpler to introduce hashlimit support for ordinary rules
instead?
Is there a particular reason for a separate chain and a separate section
type?
~ Jo
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradea
19 matches
Mail list logo
