Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update kernel 4.4 to version 4.4.30

2016-11-01 Thread Outback Dingo
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Stijn Segers wrote: > Hi, > > I rely on KanjiMonster's script to adjust the patches, so they apply > cleanly. Without it, if you start a verbose build, you'd see 'patch applied > with fuzz 2' etc. With the amount of patches a project like this one has, > clean patch

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] libubox: Add pure attribute to several functions.

2016-11-01 Thread Rosen Penev
Manually adding pure allows the compiler to optimize several functions for better performance. All were found with gcc's -Wsuggest-attribute=pure. The switch is conservative meaning there are more such functions. Signed-off by: Rosen Penev --- avl-cmp.h | 6 -- avl.c | 2 ++ blob.h

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [BUG] Kernel crashes with ath10k radio and Nexus 5X clients

2016-11-01 Thread Phil Bradley-Schmieg
Unfortunately, there are no crashlogs. If there's anything else I can do to help debug this, please let me know! On 31 October 2016 at 09:11, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi Phil, > > if you enter failsafe after boot-loop, is there a > /sys/kernel/debug/crashlog available and if-yes, can you post it

[LEDE-DEV] Separate dts for Cavium routers

2016-11-01 Thread Michał Osowiecki
Hi. I'm struggling with Cavium based routers from Cisco&Linksys trying to port them to LEDE. I do it in spare time but it get more and more complicated (especially board detection) and i would like to ask you - is it good idea to disable CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB, create separate dts for Ubiquity ER a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Has a forum been selected?

2016-11-01 Thread Ted Hess
On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 18:50 +, grgw...@unseen.is wrote: > Hey, guys. Looking forward to the start of a LEDE forum. Has a consensus been > reached on where it will be hosted? When it is up and running, will there be > any announcements other than on this mailing list? I'm wondering where I > sho

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] include: Cortex-A53 is an aarch64 CPU

2016-11-01 Thread Florian Fainelli
Fixes: SVN 48964 Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli --- include/target.mk | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/target.mk b/include/target.mk index c9c02fa03632..94d9570de387 100644 --- a/include/target.mk +++ b/include/target.mk @@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ ifeq ($(DUMP

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lots of broken packages

2016-11-01 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 10/29/2016 08:00 PM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote: > Hello > > looks like there are lots of broken packages currently. > was going to install i2c-tools but it looks like it failed with lots of > messages like: > > include/linux/i2c-dev.h:156:21: warning: inlining failed in call to > 'i2c_smbus_acces

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update kernel 4.4 to version 4.4.30

2016-11-01 Thread Stijn Segers
Hi, I rely on KanjiMonster's script to adjust the patches, so they apply cleanly. Without it, if you start a verbose build, you'd see 'patch applied with fuzz 2' etc. With the amount of patches a project like this one has, clean patches eliminate redundant output and allow you to zoom in quic

[LEDE-DEV] Has a forum been selected?

2016-11-01 Thread grgwmsm
Hey, guys. Looking forward to the start of a LEDE forum. Has a consensus been reached on where it will be hosted? When it is up and running, will there be any announcements other than on this mailing list? I'm wondering where I should keep an eye out for notice.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update kernel 4.4 to version 4.4.30

2016-11-01 Thread p . wassi
> This patch bumps the 4.4 kernel from .28 to .30 and refreshes the patches. A question regarding the 'patch refreshing' and my previous patch for 4.4.29. I want to figure out where my workflow is erroneous, or what things I did not understand when refreshing a patch series during a kernel upgrade

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] libubox: Add printf attribute to several functions.

2016-11-01 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2016-11-01 08:32, Rosen Penev wrote: > Also fixed some formats. Without this attribute, GCC does not see the several > functions as variants of the -f family of functions which prevents it from > warning about their usage. Might help with optimization too. I avoided > defining the attributes

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Fwd: TP-Link Archer C7 boot loop

2016-11-01 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 11/01/2016 08:24 AM, Jon wrote: > Thought I'd report back. I found out why I wasn't able to get console > with the serial > adapter. Long story short, it seems the TX line of my Archer C6 v2 has > something like > 500 ohms impedance to ground and to VCC! Very strange. > > The RX measures

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] TPLINK MR3420v3 support

2016-11-01 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 1 November 2016 at 11:17, Jacek Trzcinski wrote: > The patch adds support for TPLINK MR3420v3 with the extra kernel module > for non gpio controlled LEDs. > > The USB modem functionality has not been tested yet but seems to be ok > since core of the code was taken from TL-MR3420v2 and TL-WR841N

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update kernel 4.4 to version 4.4.30

2016-11-01 Thread Stijn Segers
This patch bumps the 4.4 kernel from .28 to .30 and refreshes the patches. Compile-tested on ar71xx, x86/64, ramips/mt7621, brcm47xx and kirkwood. Run-tested on ar71xx & ramips/mt7621, brcm47xx and kirkwood (last two confirmed by P. Wassi). Signed-off-by: Stijn Segers --- include/kernel-version

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Patch submit question

2016-11-01 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi Jacek, I see - in this case feel free to send it by mail, maybe gzip the patch to make it smaller. ~ Jo signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Patch submit question

2016-11-01 Thread Jacek Trzcinski
Mail seems to be the fastest and simplest way to me. My doubts was concerned with the size of the .diff file only. But if you accept this I will send it. Regards, Jacek > Hi Jacek, > > if you're not used to sending patches via mailing lists then it is maybe > best to open a pull request at htt

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update kernel 4.4 to version 4.4.29

2016-11-01 Thread p . wassi
> Could it be you didn't refresh patches? > > I applied your patch for .28, then refreshed all supported targets for > .29, and I had 30 patches that were updated. Your patch only updates > include/kernel-version.mk. I've checked the kernel changelog and compared this to all LEDE-patches-4.4.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update kernel 4.4 to version 4.4.29

2016-11-01 Thread francesco . borromini
Hi Paul, Could it be you didn't refresh patches? I applied your patch for .28, then refreshed all supported targets for .29, and I had 30 patches that were updated. Your patch only updates include/kernel-version.mk. (I'll be sending in .28 -> .30 shortly). Cheers Stijn Resent because of

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Patch submit question

2016-11-01 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi Jacek, if you're not used to sending patches via mailing lists then it is maybe best to open a pull request at https://github.com/lede-project/source. If you have no interest in working further on your changes then give a short note in the PR description so that someone else can take over the

[LEDE-DEV] Patch submit question

2016-11-01 Thread Jacek Trzcinski
Hi All, I have a question concerned path submit method. I've just prepared a big patch for TPLINK MR3420v3 support. The diff file weight abt 27k (750 code lines including and extra kernel module for LED support). BTW: I do not suppose to be regular LEDE developer. I just was forced to get workin

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] libubox: Add printf attribute to several functions.

2016-11-01 Thread Rosen Penev
Also fixed some formats. Without this attribute, GCC does not see the several functions as variants of the -f family of functions which prevents it from warning about their usage. Might help with optimization too. I avoided defining the attributes in utils.h since different functions have differ

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Fwd: TP-Link Archer C7 boot loop

2016-11-01 Thread Jon
Thought I'd report back. I found out why I wasn't able to get console with the serial adapter. Long story short, it seems the TX line of my Archer C6 v2 has something like 500 ohms impedance to ground and to VCC! Very strange. The RX measures about 10K both to gnd and VCC, like you'd expe