Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Libreoffice products name (writer, cal, base, ...)

Interesting. The corresponding page http://techbase.kde.org/Localization/Tools/Pology looks a bit slim though, is this just brand new and in development or ancient and sadly dying? Michael 02/08/2011 03:28, sgrìobh Marek Laane: Just a remark: in KDE there is something called pology which is

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: REMINDER: Release 3.3.4-rc1 from libreoffice-3-3 branch

Hi, Original-Nachricht > Von: Andras Timar > 2011.08.01. 13:19 keltezéssel, Sophie Gautier írta: > > Hi Andras, all, > > On 01/08/2011 12:05, Andre Schnabel wrote: > > >> Would like so see 3.5 strings rahter sooner than later ;) > > > > +1 :) > > I understand your concern ab

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Libreoffice products name (writer, cal, base,...)

Hi Mikel, * > Von: Mikel Pascual - Akaita > > I checked about a dozen languages, and almost everybody translates > "%PRODUCTNAME Writer" (for example) as "%PRODUCTNAME Writer". > > And I'm wondering... why is that so? Because people are used to do it that way :) > Is that a directive from th

[libreoffice-l10n] [ANNOUNCE] Branch libreoffice-3-3-4 created

Hi all, there have been created the libreoffice-3-3-4 branch. It will be used for fine tuning of the 3.3.4 bugfix release. It is based on the tag libreoffice-3.3.4.1 for 3.3.4-rc1 release. The following rules apply: + preferably just translation or blocker fixes + only cherry-pic

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Problems registering in pootle

Hi Branislav, 2011.08.02 14:43, Branislav Klocok wrote: Can you please mark me as the admin of Slovakian translations? I have agreed with Milos to migrate the whole team from OOo under my leadership. Milos will be my co-lead. I just did it. For future reference, keep in mind that language admi

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Libreoffice products name (writer, cal, base, ...)

2011/8/2 Michael Bauer > Interesting. The corresponding page http://techbase.kde.org/** > Localization/Tools/Pologylooks > a bit slim though, is this just brand new and in development or > ancient and sadly dying? > > > Michael > > Probably neit