For small languages even having a spell checker is huge. There's quite
a few English dictionaries out there to help you with this or that,
but when whole country has population equivalent to only one (average)
US city, everything is extra hard.
That is why is such a tool _more_ then welco
03.05.2016 u 20:35, toki je napisao/la:
On 03/05/2016 15:51, Kruno wrote:
not doubled maintained word lists by multiple maintainers (not
knowing each other)
will not and can not be resolved.
With a central repository for working on dictionaries, it is far
easier for two individuals intere
03.05.2016 u 20:49, Michael Bauer je napisao/la:
Totally disagree from experience. Of course, both is better but you
try working in a language with not even a spellchecker and then get
someone to count the errors. Even mediocre spellcheck coverage kills a
good % of typos. I just have to take a
Totally disagree from experience. Of course, both is better but you try
working in a language with not even a spellchecker and then get someone
to count the errors. Even mediocre spellcheck coverage kills a good % of
typos. I just have to take a random Gaelic page off the BBC and dump it
in LO
On 03/05/2016 15:51, Kruno wrote:
not doubled maintained word lists by multiple maintainers (not knowing each
other)
will not and can not be resolved.
With a central repository for working on dictionaries, it is far easier
for two individuals interested in the same dictionary to find each
Michael and people,
I make a brief explanation of how .AFF files work in Proofing Tool GUI's
manual:
http://marcoagpinto.cidadevirtual.pt/proofingtoolgui_files/ProofingToolGUI_manual_V30.html
But it is an unfinished manual since I haven't had much free time to
work on everything.
Kind regards,
There are many things about Hunspell that make me shake my head in
disbelief ;) All the more so given how widely used it is. Like the lack
of documentation to the outside world. I mean, like a user friendly
"Here is how you make a spellchecker for your language" and "All about
affixes" page. Bu
03.05.2016 u 17:58, Michael Bauer je napisao/la:
Sgrìobh Kruno na leanas 03/05/2016 aig 16:51:
will not and can not be resolved.
Who's dictionary to include to that single repository, how to merge
them, how to resolve different concepts (what to include, what to
exclude), how to merge af
Sgrìobh Kruno na leanas 03/05/2016 aig 16:51:
will not and can not be resolved.
Who's dictionary to include to that single repository, how to merge
them, how to resolve different concepts (what to include, what to
exclude), how to merge affix files with different affix classes (that
will b
03.05.2016 u 13:29, Dennis Roczek je napisao/la:
And in this paragraph is lying more stuff than some might imagine. Marco
is doing a great job, but because of the underestimate of the hunspell
features and the "wrongly" used git, he is not able to update the
bundled dictionary of LibreOffice (thr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi *,
Am 01.05.2016 um 16:25 schrieb Marco A.G.Pinto:
> Hello!
>
> This is what I have been doing for nearly three years.
>
> I and other people realised that the bundled dictionaries were totally
> outdated and I had some difficulties setting up
Appreciate your good work Marco, many thanks!
Michael
Sgrìobh Marco A.G.Pinto na leanas 01/05/2016 aig 15:25:
My forked en_GB is the best British dictionary around and I have even
bought a Gold Account in Oxford Dictionaries in order to test the words
so that I may add them if needed. I first p
12 matches
Mail list logo
