KX-T: KX-TD7890

2002-11-05 Thread Dick M. Snow
Anyone know where a used/new 7890 (long range model) might be lurking. I just had someone call who had their handset and charging cradle stolen (but not the base station) and is looking for a replacement. Assuming there are none left anywhere, how does the Engenius EP-436 or SN-920 compare in t

KX-T: RE: kxt digest, Vol 10 #219 - 12 msgs

2002-11-05 Thread Mike Frederick
I keep reading that TD500 Maint. software doesn't work on Win2K, but I use it on Win2K pro all the time. Getting ready to upgrade that box to Win2K server so I can use Windows Terminal server into the box. I also use this box to connect to TVS200 (via QVTTerm) and another add-on serial port for S

KX-T: pointers for VOIP implementation

2002-11-05 Thread Keith Morse
I've been thrust into a situation where I'm required to provide a VOIP solution for a customer of ours. My normal job is systems/network administrator and I take care of the phone system for our business (a KX-T123211D with TVS-50). The customer's phone gent has a bad case of blinders and ap

Re: KX-T: RE: kxt digest, Vol 10 #219 - 12 msgs

2002-11-05 Thread Nils Finnsson
Good morning, Thats pretty weird. I had a laptop here with 2kpro installed on it and attempted to connect to the TD500 with the Maint. Software with no success. The same laptop and HyperTerminal was able to connect to the TVP200 system. So I know the serial port works, but the TD500 so

KX-T: Re: KX-TD7890

2002-11-05 Thread Michael N. Marcus
SN920 is the new long-range champ and is a fine phone. First production of EP436 had lots of trouble and we returned all we bought. Michael N. Marcus AbleComm, Inc. www.ablecomm.com etc. 1977 - 2002: Still Alive at 25 - Original Message - From: "Dick M. Snow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[

Re: KX-T: pointers for VOIP implementation

2002-11-05 Thread Don Ritchie
You may want to look at the Norstar BCM, there is a mailing list ( much like this one ) devoted to BCM ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] "another thing", Although fine equipment ( NEVER PUT ANYTHING DOWN ) Cisco routers will cost at least 30% more BECAUSE of the name. Keith Morse wrote: > > I've been thrus

RE: KX-T: pointers for VOIP implementation

2002-11-05 Thread Chris Fowler
Keith, I set up a VOIP link using the single port Multitech gateways. All worked fine, the proprietary mode was used as the VOIP gateways were behind firewalls which were not H.323 compliant. The only gotcha was detecting call termination. One kind soul off this list helped me out. The solutio

KX-T: Re: pointers for VOIP implementation

2002-11-05 Thread Dave Phelps
Ok. So you're going to link 2 switches. I haven't used the Multitech units, so I won't comment specifically on those. I have used Cisco's VoIP hardware, which I've had good luck with, so my perspective is based on how *I* would do this using Cisco hardware, but I would imagine you can substitute th

RE: KX-T: RE: kxt digest, Vol 10 #219 - 12 msgs

2002-11-05 Thread Michael Karaman
I run Win 2K Pro on my Winbook Z1 also for the 500 but it is not always stable. I have about a 75% success rate on connecting and downloading the first time. If the connection is lost or the program decides to hang up at 87% complete, a control alt delete is necessary to do an End Task on the 500

Re: KX-T: pointers for VOIP implementation

2002-11-05 Thread Keith Morse
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Don Ritchie wrote: > You may want to look at the Norstar BCM, there is a mailing list > ( much like this one ) devoted to BCM ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for the reference. I'll check this out. > "another thing", Although fine equipment ( NEVER PUT ANYTHING DOWN ) > Cisco

RE: KX-T: pointers for VOIP implementation

2002-11-05 Thread Keith Morse
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Chris Fowler wrote: > Keith, > > I set up a VOIP link using the single port Multitech gateways. All worked > fine, the proprietary mode was used as the VOIP gateways were behind > firewalls which were not H.323 compliant. > > The only gotcha was detecting call termination.

Re: KX-T: Re: pointers for VOIP implementation

2002-11-05 Thread Keith Morse
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Dave Phelps wrote: > Ok. So you're going to link 2 switches. I haven't used the Multitech units, > so I won't comment specifically on those. I have used Cisco's VoIP hardware, > which I've had good luck with, so my perspective is based on how *I* would > do this using Cisco har

Re: KX-T: Caller ID Table

2002-11-05 Thread larry
Paul, years ago, when we first tested the CID boards on kxtd, i think we determined that the lookup table will not work when there is anything sent in the name field. the original kxtd implementation only supported number delivery, and later, name delivery was added. (p101a to p101e ver) i wil

KX-T: TD1232-5 DOUBLE CABINET

2002-11-05 Thread John Burk
Tech's & Other List Fans, Whats the rule on the inter-connection of a TD1232-5 and another KSU doubled for expansion? -5 to a -5 or can it be a -5 to a -4 or what other versions can the -5 double with for ext. expansion purposes? Peace multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kep

RE: KX-T: TD1232-5 DOUBLE CABINET

2002-11-05 Thread Carl Navarro
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Burk Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:28 PM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: KX-T: TD1232-5 DOUBLE CABINET Tech's & Other List Fans, Whats the rule on the inter-connection of a TD1232-5 and anoth

Re: KX-T: Re: pointers for VOIP implementation

2002-11-05 Thread Dave Phelps
I thought it was an analog 1232? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dave Phelps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: RE: KX-T: Re: pointers for VOIP implementation | | Actually, a D1232 will support E&M via the T1 mo