KX-T: Re: sharing duties

Unnamed Administration sources reported that Charles Patterson said: > > I think I understand... > > Does this work? > Calls come 1:1 to ext. A > If A is fwd/busy/na to B, then B can help answer the calls, right? > If B is fwd/busy/na to voicemail, won't A's caller end up in A's box? My guess

KX-T: Re: sharing duties

I think I understand... Does this work? Calls come 1:1 to ext. A If A is fwd/busy/na to B, then B can help answer the calls, right? If B is fwd/busy/na to voicemail, won't A's caller end up in A's box? Since the call came in 1:1 to A, then A can be considered the "owner" of the call. Even thou