Unnamed Administration sources reported that Charles Patterson said: > > I think I understand... > > Does this work? > Calls come 1:1 to ext. A > If A is fwd/busy/na to B, then B can help answer the calls, right? > If B is fwd/busy/na to voicemail, won't A's caller end up in A's box?
My guess too but... > Since the call came in 1:1 to A, then A can be considered the "owner" of > the call. Even though A is fwd to B, the call should not end up in B's box, > it will end up back in A's box. > > A's mailbox can also have a covering extension of B if desired, so A's > message can say " sorry I'm out, to speak with my assistant press 0 now". > I think so. But every time I look at one of these deals, I curse Panasonic as they have some gotcha I don't spot until the last stage, and THAT keeps it from working. (If only the 102 VM had multiple custom menus...) -- A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED] & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 _________________________________________________________________ KX-T Mailing list --- http://kxthelp.com/ Subscription changes: http://kxthelp.com/mailman/listinfo/kxt
