KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution...

2002-11-18 Thread Rocky Freel
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 2:55 PM To: Rocky Freel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution... On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Rocky Freel wrote: > Oh boy! [ Lot's o' snippage} > Let's come up with a solution f

Re: KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution...

2002-11-17 Thread Keith Morse
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Rocky Freel wrote: > Oh boy! [ Lot's o' snippage} > Let's come up with a solution for this problem! I've kept your post from October 30 because I was intrigued. But I'm a bit confused as to what the problem is? Terminal Server solutions have been around for a long time

KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution...

2002-11-15 Thread Rocky Freel
Oh boy! Just so this mis-information stops here, the original RS-232 spec was for 20,000bits/second at 50ft. So at several hundred feet I assume you prefer 2400 baud for some reason. Maximum Data Rate (bps) Maximum Length) 2,400 (2.4K) 120m (400ft) 4,800 (4.8K) 60m (200ft) 9,600 (9.6K) 30m (100

Re: KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution...

2002-11-15 Thread Phil Barrett
I totally agree. Personally, I have 4 other serial devices I want to deal with. this gets to be a complete mess if its a hard wired cable. Oh, and dont move the programming computer. Phil At 10:12 AM 11/15/2002 -0500, David Lesher wrote: >Unnamed Administration sources reported that [EMAIL

Re: KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution...

2002-11-15 Thread David Lesher
Unnamed Administration sources reported that [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > there has been several messages about programming the kxt by lan via serial > port servers. > > Why??? > > serial cables can go several hundred feet in lenth. I use cat 5 cable with a > breakout on the ends to cary the s

Re: KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution...

2002-10-30 Thread Phil Barrett
At 02:28 PM 10/30/2002 -0800, Nils Finnsson wrote: > extremely techie but way cool description delete > > But hey, this sort of setup isn't for everyone. yeah, but it it is for anyone who matters... :) _ KX-T Mailing list -

Re: KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution...

2002-10-30 Thread Schultz Comm
of a phone veteran. Best to all, Jim - Original Message - From: "Nils Finnsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:28 PM Subject: Re: KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution... > Just my $0.02 on this whole remo

Re: KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution...

2002-10-30 Thread Nils Finnsson
Just my $0.02 on this whole remote administration stuff. I have a td500 and tvp200 setup here and originally was sitting in the server room (where the phone stuff also happens to live) working on a laptop through a serial cable to configure both systems. Ya, this worked, but it became a lo

Re: KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution...

2002-10-30 Thread Phil Barrett
damn, I thought you were talking about my set up! I've got all those puppies except a managed hub. Plus, I have a card key system and a linux based mp3/divx server that I also use for sdmr logging. a TS is totally the way to go. In defense of the linux solution, this can provide a significant n

KX-T: Continued Quest for Terminal Server Solution...

2002-10-30 Thread Rocky Freel
Good ideas, BUT 1) Use a PC... Are you going to install one at every account? Or do you like sitting on the floor of the phone closet to do your programming. With 802.11b Wireless you can connect a Terminal server the size of pack of cigarettes in the phone room and sit with your laptop in the