Oh boy!
Just so this mis-information stops here, the original RS-232 spec was for
20,000bits/second at 50ft. So at several hundred feet I assume you prefer
2400 baud for some reason.

Maximum Data Rate (bps) Maximum Length)

2,400 (2.4K) 120m (400ft)

4,800 (4.8K) 60m (200ft)

9,600 (9.6K) 30m (100ft)

19,200 (19.2K) 15m (50ft)

38,400 (38.4) 7.5m (25ft)

57,600 (57.6K) 5.0m (16ft)

115,200 (115.2K) 2.5m (8ft)


This ASSUMES full RS-232C compliance. Once upon a time it was common to use
+_12 TO 15 VDC for the power supply on the RS-232(C) Line drivers. +- 5-9v
is a lot more common now. AND RS-232 compliant cabling NOT CAT 5 or speaker
wire, er oh I guess unless it Monster cable. ;o)

And when you run RS-232 through CAT 5 twisted pair cabling what signals are
you pairing together? Tx and RX, TxD and ground??? BOTH wrong. If it was
RS-422 differential then Cat 5 would be very nice.

BUT- one of the main purposes' is to find a terminal server here so we don't
have to run cabling to a dedicated location.

I have seen several post using a pc which will obviously work for small port
counts (1-4). -But- a terminal server consumes <2W /channel has no hard
drive or software to install (or fail). And even a 32 port device is the
size of a six pack. AND for those who fancy Linux that's what they run, not
that the OS makes ANY  difference what so ever in an embedded application.
ALSO many folks don't have a clue that if you read the data sheet for PC
power supply they ARE NOT rated for 24x7 POH(Power on Hours) most are
limited to less than 70%POH. Whoops I almost forgot same problem with many
desktop disk drives AND almost all 2.5" drives. Even IBM's wonderful
microdive are limited 50 POH/week. Sorry.

Let's come up with a solution for this problem!





_________________________________________________________________
KX-T Mailing list --- http://kxthelp.com/
Subscription changes: http://kxthelp.com/mailman/listinfo/kxt

Reply via email to