On 8/28/2023 6:37 PM, Phillip Matheson via KRnet wrote:
Great photo. Thanks.
It shows almost all of your temps and pressures as well.
Phil.
++
My gauges are never that "on point". That was blind luck. I took the
photo to r
Great photo. Thanks.
It shows almost all of your temps and pressures as well.
Phil.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 29 Aug 2023, at 08:40, Larry Flesner via KRnet
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 8/27/2023 10:28 PM, Phillip Matheson via KRnet wrote:
>> I had the tach overhauled, ASI checks out
>> I’m lo
To throw some more math in:
Your "actual speed" (120) vs. "theoretical speed" (132) would be
120/132=0.9090909 or 91% efficiency (over simplification): not too bad.
Mark W
N952MW (res)
On 8/27/2023 10:28 PM, Phillip Matheson via KRnet wrote:
I had the tach overhauled, ASI checks out
I’m
>
> I have taken to using GPS to measure speed. Direct read on a calm day,
opposing passes on a day with wind.
jg
>
--
KRnet mailing list
KRnet@list.krnet.org
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
The tack was overhauled, cleaned and hour meter reset to 000. We have checked
with a calibrated optical tach that count the RPM. it’s very close at high rpm.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 28 Aug 2023, at 13:29, Phillip Matheson
> wrote:
>
> I had the tach overhauled, ASI checks out
> I’m lookin
I had the tach overhauled, ASI checks out
I’m looking at props and prices. The same male prop, 60 x 68 is around $2700
Aust
Your saying 156 mph (135 kts) not a hope
My 70 “ pitch gets 120 kts 2300
My prop 60 x 70 p
70 x 2300 x 60 / 12 /5280 = 152 mph. (132 kts)
Phil.
Sent from my iPhone
>
I've learned over time doing prop balances that most mechanical tachometers
read low at the high end. The Dynavibe reads out optical RPM and there have
been quite a few plane owners surprised to find their engines are turning
faster than their tachs have been reporting.
Mike StirewaltKSEE
--
On 8/27/2023 4:18 AM, Phillip Matheson via KRnet wrote:
FYI I removed my 60 x 70 today and put a 68 x 59 ( too low of a pitch) but
gave it a single flight
Static, brakes wouldn’t hold but around 2400
Climb 2500 70kts over 1000 rpm
WOT over 2750 only 100kts
Phil.
+
FYI I removed my 60 x 70 today and put a 68 x 59 ( too low of a pitch) but
gave it a single flight
Static, brakes wouldn’t hold but around 2400
Climb 2500 70kts over 1000 rpm
WOT over 2750 only 100kts
Phil.
Sent from my iPhone
--
KRnet mailing list
KRnet@list.krnet.org
https://list.krnet.or
9 matches
Mail list logo