drag. Is that not right?
>
>
> Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: KRnet [mailto:krnet-bounces at list.krnet.org] On Behalf Of Dave
> McCauley
> via KRnet
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 11:56 AM
> To: 'KRnet'
gt; Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 11:56 AM
> To: 'KRnet'
> Subject: Re: KR> aileron controls
>
> Just to clarify, when the aileron moves downward, lift is increased and the
> wing is deflected upwards. The increased lift of the wing, increases drag
> on that wing which
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 11:56 AM
To: 'KRnet'
Subject: Re: KR> aileron controls
Just to clarify, when the aileron moves downward, lift is increased and the
wing is deflected upwards. The increased lift of the wing, increases drag
on that wing which produces adverse yaw. So to
Just to clarify, when the aileron moves downward, lift is increased and the
wing is deflected upwards. The increased lift of the wing, increases drag
on that wing which produces adverse yaw. So to counter this, aileron
controls can be designed to increase the deflection on the downward moving
win
n aileron vs. up on the other side if that
makes your plane more likely to stall the outside wing and spin if you get
too slow turning final.
Original Message
Subject: KR> aileron controls
From: "joe.kr2s.builder--- via KRnet" < <mailto:krnet
Morning Guys,How important is the differential aileron deflection in
anyone’s opinion. I am working through the final configuration of a push
pull system and getting 20 deg down and 10 deg. Up on the opposite side is a
bit problematic. (I think)Thanks,Joe Horton,N357CJSecond one under construct
When I designed my aileron controls I made them adjustable for up and down
travel. I do not remember why but I was a bit leery of having the
differential travel so I drilled push rod attach points in the bell crank
which would give me equal aileron travel and also the differential travel.
When
on the other side if
that makes your plane more likely to stall the outside wing and spin if
you get too slow turning final.
Original Message
Subject: KR> aileron controls
From: "joe.kr2s.builder--- via KRnet"
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Thu, December 1
I did not have full deflection and by the performance, I could not tell.
However, I can imagine that under slow flight in windy conditions, it might
become a problem.
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 12:45 PM, joe.kr2s.builder--- via KRnet wrote:
=
Morning Guys,How important is the
At 06:55 PM 4/27/2013, you wrote:
>To reduce the binding I added a small standoff to drop the forward
>rod end a little bit.
Rob Schmitt
++
You're right. The geometry of that assembly doesn't work too well
without a standoff at
Todd,
Hopefully I can help. I have a plans built system. The rod bearings provide
some but only limited movement up and down. To reduce the binding I added a
small standoff to drop the forward rod end a little bit. I also found that I
had to add a slight bend to the rod which was the final tric
Is this what you are referring to?
http://krbuilder.org/Aileron/AileronLinkage/index.html
See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics?
See you Oct. 4 and 5, 2013 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il ? MVN
Daniel R. Heath -?Lexington, SC
At 11:12 AM 4/27/2013, you wrote:
>I guess the question is: when built to plans, do those brackets
>allow any movement up and down.
I seem to recall that being my concern and is why I went with a
heavier stock. The bra
On 4/27/2013 7:14 AM, RdRacer53 at aol.com wrote:
>
> I am finishing my annual condition inspection on my KR2S and have found
> something my A&P is a little concerned about.
>
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/
I am finishing my annual condition inspection on my KR2S and have found
something my A&P is a little concerned about.
The control junction between the stubby wings and the aileron appears to be
making a slight elliptical pattern when the ailerons are moved, as if the
bottom half of the brac
>
>The control junction between the stubby wings and the aileron appears to be
> making a slight elliptical pattern when the ailerons are moved, as if the
>bottom half of the bracket supporting the bell crank was wobbling a little.
>
>Todd Thelin
+
I guess the question is: when built to plans, do those brackets allow any
movement up and down.
It looks like the boomerang shaped one is so long from where it attaches that
it would not provide enough support to remain rigid under any kind of load.
Larry&Sallie Flesner wrote:
>
>>
>>The con
17 matches
Mail list logo
