KR> Tri-Gear KR's - / tail wheel

2008-11-07 Thread Jeff Scott
Perfect landings!!! Now there's a laugh. My personal landing technique is to beat the plane against the ground until it gives up and quits flying. :o) Landing a tailwheel aircraft is just another skill to add to your repertoire as a pilot and will improve one's overall pilot skills. It teac

KR> Tri-Gear KR's - / tail wheel

2008-11-07 Thread Dana Overall
I'll chime in a little bit here. Before flying my taildragger, I did what Larry did with his KR. I did a lot of taxing up and down the runway. At first I would slowly add power while keeping the tail down. As I felt more comforable, I picked a day when the wind was directly down the runway

KR> Tri-Gear KR's - / tail wheel

2008-11-07 Thread Erik Kline
Larry wrote: "As if adding a nose wheel will insure 100% perfect landings." I wanted to know what it takes to get a tail dragger rating and it's not as difficult as I expected. Section 61.31 part (i) of FAR states: (i) Additional training required for operating tailwheel airpl

KR> Tri-Gear KR's - / tail wheel

2008-11-07 Thread Mark Langford
Troy Petteway has flown a lot of tailwheel planes, and he says the KR is the easiest taildragger of them all to land. And he also says mine's the best of the KRs he's flown (and that's a lot of them). That may be because of the wide stance and near perfect gear geometry. I agree with Larry t

KR> Tri-Gear KR's - / tail wheel

2008-11-07 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner
At 08:57 PM 11/6/2008, you wrote: >With the center of gravity (centroid of mass?) being behind the landing >gear, it seems to me taildraggers are an accident waiting to happen. They >are inherently unstable. But if 100% of your landings are perfect and you >know they will continue to be, regardless

KR> Tri-Gear KR's - final post

2008-11-06 Thread George Bearden
With the center of gravity (centroid of mass?) being behind the landing gear, it seems to me taildraggers are an accident waiting to happen. They are inherently unstable. But if 100% of your landings are perfect and you know they will continue to be, regardless of weather then maybe you don't need

KR> Tri-Gear KR's

2008-11-05 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner
At 11:51 AM 11/5/2008, you wrote: >And two of the airplanes involved, the 185 and the Beaver, are >both easier to land than a KR-2 with conventional gear. Ron Vogt ++ I can't imagine a fixed gear airplane being ea

KR> Tri-Gear KR's - final post

2008-11-05 Thread Ron Vogt
shiny new KR in one piece...install tricycle landing gear. > Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:20:20 -0600> From: fles...@verizon.net> To: kr...@mylist.net> Subject: KR> Tri-Gear KR's - final post> > At 05:47 AM 11/5/2008, you wrote:> >Having my> >t

KR> Tri-Gear KR's - final post

2008-11-05 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner
At 05:47 AM 11/5/2008, you wrote: >Having my >tri-gear KR called a Flying Milkstool would annoy me too, Mike ++ Having owned and flown a Tri-Pacer for 500+ hours I can only smile when I hear it called a flying milk stool. I know that comment comes from

KR> Tri-Gear KR's

2008-11-05 Thread laser...@juno.com
Puzzling over the disharmony my response to Derek created, I think it mainly was the unfortunate choice of a posting title. Flying Milkstools referred to the Tri-Pacer I used as an example in the posting. Having my tri-gear KR called a Flying Milkstool would annoy me too, but that's not what I me